Objective: To compare TVT with COLPOSUSPENSION (CS) as primary treatment for stress incontinence (SUI). Design: Randomised, open, comparative trial 3-years follow-up. Participants: 49 consecutive 35 to 70 years old women with urodynamic SUI. Setting: Urology department of a district general hospital at Leganés (Madrid), Spain. Intervention: 24 patients randomised to TVT and 25 to CS.
Background: Evidence comparing effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and Burch's colposuspension (CS) in the long term follow-up is weak. Objective: To compare TVT with CS as primary treatment for stress incontinence (SUI). Design: Randomised, open, comparative trial 3-years follow-up. Participants: 49 consecutive 35 to 70 years old women with urodynamic SUI. Setting: Urology department of a district general hospital at Leganés (Madrid), Spain. Intervention: 24 patients randomised to TVT and 25 to CS. Measurements: Main outcome: Assessment before treatment and at 6-months, 1-year and 3-years postoperatively with the incontinence severity symptoms index (ISS) and the incontinence impact symptoms index (IIS) Secondary outcome: 3 groups to asses cure rates: cured, improved and failure.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
50
Hospital Severo Ochoa
Leganés, Madrid, Spain
Subjective SUI cure evaluated with incontinence severity symptoms (ISS) and incontinence impact symptoms (IIS)
Criteria were established to include patients in one of three groups: cure, improved and treatment failure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.