The objective of this study is to compare the results of total thyroidectomy using the new harmonic scalpel device (FOCUS) to that with the previously available harmonic scalpel device (HARMONIC ACE).
Although the harmonic scalpel has been shown to be safe and effective in thyroid surgery, several surgeons consider the previously available instruments to be large and cumbersome, especially in terms of tissue fine grasping and dissection capabilities. To this context, an innovative technical improvement of the device for thyroid surgery has very recently been implemented and has been made available in 2008. Utilization of this new device, however, has not been evaluated in any study. The objective of this prospective randomized study is to compare the results of total thyroidectomy using the new harmonic scalpel device (FOCUS) to that with the previously available harmonic scalpel device (HARMONIC ACE) in respect to hemostasis, operative time and postoperative complications. All patients submitted to total thyroidectomy are randomized into two groups: those submitted to total thyroidectomy using the FOCUS device (group Α) and those with HARMONIC ACE (group Β).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
90
harmonic scalpel device utilized intraoperatively (FOCUS in group A and HARMONIC ACE in group B patients)
Department of Endocrine Surgery, 1st Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Hippocratio General Hospital of Athens, Athens Medical School, University of Athens
Athens, Abelokipoi (Q. Sofias 114 Av.), Greece
Hemostasis
Time frame: intraoperatively & postoperatively
Postoperative complications including laryngeal nerve palsy, hypocalcemia, hemorrhage, hematoma, wound infection and skin burn
Time frame: postoperatively
Operative time
Time frame: from skin incision to skin closure
Length of hospital stay
Time frame: postoperatively
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.