This study will compare the safety and efficacy of initial combination treatment with aliskiren + amlodipine to sequential add-on treatment strategies with aliskiren or amlodipine in patients with hypertension.
This study was designed to evaluate if patients with hypertension treated early with a combination therapy would achieve better blood pressure (BP) control, than patients being treated with a classical sequential add-on therapy. The study compared the effects of the two treatment strategies: Treatment initiation on a single compound, either with aliskiren or amlodipine, and then continuation with the combination of both versus treatment initiation with the combination of aliskiren/amlodipine and then continuation with the combination. The study also evaluated if the overall mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP)-lowering effect during the study, as well as the change from baseline to study end in msSBP, are superior in the group having received combination therapy from the beginning. The study further evaluated the BP-lowering efficacy and tolerability of both treatment strategies.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
1,254
Amlodipine (5 mg and 10 mg) was provided as capsules taken orally once daily.
Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg capsules were taken orally once daily
Aliskiren 150 mg and aliskiren 300 mg were provided as film-coated tablets, taken orally once daily.
Investigative Site
Toronto, Canada
Investigative Site
San José, Costa Rica
Investigative Site
Paris, France
Investigative Site
Bonn, Germany
Overall Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Over 8, 16 and 24 Weeks
Systolic Blood Pressure was measured in a sitting position using a validated automated blood pressure monitor (the Omron device) according to Guidelines of the British Hypertension Society, at Baseline and over 8, 16 and 24 weeks of study treatment. The overall mean change in msSBP from baseline was estimated over three time points: Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24. Analysis used a repeated measures Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, visit, and region as factors, treatment by visit interaction and baseline msSBP as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) at Week 24
Systolic Blood pressure was measured in a sitting position using a validated automated blood pressure monitor (the Omron device) according to Guidelines of the British Hypertension Society, at Baseline and 24 weeks of study treatment. Analysis used a repeated measures ANCOVA model with treatment, visit and region as factors, treatment by visit interaction and baseline msSBP as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) at Week 32
Diastolic Blood Pressure was measured in a sitting position using a validated automated blood pressure monitor (the Omron device) according to Guidelines of the British Hypertension Society, at Baseline and 32 weeks of study treatment. Change at Week 32 used a separate repeated measures ANCOVA model containing Week 8, 16, 24 and 32 data. Treatment, visit and region were factors in the model, treatment by visit interaction and baseline msDBP a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline to 32 weeks
Overall Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) Over 8, 16, and 24 Weeks
Diastolic Blood pressure was measured in a sitting position using a validated automated blood pressure monitor (the Omron device) according to Guidelines of the British Hypertension Society, at Baseline and over 8, 16 and 24 weeks of study treatment. The overall mean change in msDBP from baseline was estimated over three time points: Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24. Analysis used a repeated measures ANCOVA model with treatment, visit and regions as factors, treatment by visit interaction and baseline msDBP as a covariate.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Investigative Site
Athens, Greece
Investigative Site
Guatemala City, Guatemala
Investigative Site
Cape Town, South Africa
Investigative Site
Basel, Switzerland
Investigative Site
London, United Kingdom
Investigative Site
Caracas, Venezuela
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) at Week 24
Diastolic Blood pressure was measured in a sitting position using a validated automated blood pressure monitor (the Omron device) according to Guidelines of the British Hypertension Society, at Baseline and 24 weeks of study treatment. Analysis used a repeated measures ANCOVA model with treatment, visit and region, as factors, treatment by visit interaction and baseline msDBP as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Percentage of Participants Achieving Overall Blood Pressure Control at 8, 16, 24 and 32 Weeks Endpoints
Systolic \& Diastolic Blood Pressure were measured in a sitting position using a validated automated blood pressure monitor (the Omron device) according to Guidelines of the British Hypertension Society, at Baseline and after 8, 16 , 24 and 32 weeks. Outcome is reported as percentage of participants achieving overall blood pressure control (msSBP \<140 mmHg and msDBP \<90 mmHg) at weeks 8, 16, 24 \& 32 endpoints.
Time frame: Baseline to week 8, 16, 24 and 32 endpoints