The primary objective of this study was to document the long-term safety and tolerability of teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) participants with relapse. The secondary objective was to document the long-term efficacy on disability progression, relapse rate and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) parameters.
Participants completing the EFC6049 (HMR1726D/3001) study were given the opportunity to continue in the extension study; * participants receiving teriflunomide 7 mg or 14 mg were blindly maintained on the same dose of teriflunomide. * participants receiving placebo were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to teriflunomide 7 mg or 14 mg. The study period per participant was broken down as follows: * Double-blind treatment: up to a maximum of 288 weeks or until teriflunomide was commercially available in the country where participant lived, * Post-washout follow-up: 4 weeks after last treatment intake. No post-washout follow up if participant continued on teriflunomide treatment by obtaining its commercial form after end of the study. The total duration of the extension was 292 weeks (about 6 years) from the first participant enrolled or until teriflunomide is commercially available in the country where participant lived.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
742
Tablet, oral administration QD.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs: AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period which was defined as the period from the time of first dose of study drug (in LTS6050) up to 4 weeks (28 days) after last dose of study drug. Serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included both serious and non-serious AEs.
Time frame: Baseline (LTS6050) up to 28 days after last dose of study drug up to 450 weeks
Time to 12 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP
Sustained DP defined as sustained increase of at least 1 point from baseline (EFC6049) expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score (0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS\>5.5) persisting for at least 12 weeks. EDSS: an ordinal scale qualifies disability in participants with MS. EDSS total score range: 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to Multiple Sclerosis \[MS\]). Probability of DP at 12 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on time to DP defined as date of first DP minus (-) date of randomization in EFC6049 study +1 day. Participants free of DP (no DP observed on treatment) were censored at the date of last on-treatment EDSS evaluation in LTS6050. Kaplan-Meier method consists in computing probabilities of non-occurrence of event at any observed time of event and multiplying successive probabilities for time ≤t by any earlier computed probabilities to estimate the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t.
Time frame: Up to 10.8 years (EFC6049: 108 weeks + LTS6050: 450 weeks)
Time to 24 Week Sustained Disability Progression (DP): Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of DP
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Investigational Site Number 1032
Maitland, Florida, United States
Investigational Site Number 1038
Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
Investigational Site Number 1033
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Investigational Site Number 1037
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
Investigational Site Number 1603
Graz, Austria
Investigational Site Number 1604
Innsbruck, Austria
Investigational Site Number 1601
Vienna, Austria
Investigational Site Number 1602
Vienna, Austria
Investigational Site Number 1208
Calgary, Canada
Investigational Site Number 1212
Gatineau, Canada
...and 106 more locations
Sustained DP was defined as sustained increase of at least 1 point from baseline (EFC6049) EDSS score (0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS\>5.5) persisting for at least 24 weeks. EDSS: an ordinal scale qualifies disability in participants with MS. EDSS total score range: 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). Probability of DP at 24 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on time to DP defined as date of first DP minus (-) date of randomization in EFC6049 study +1 day. Participants free of DP (no DP observed on treatment) were censored at the date of last on-treatment EDSS evaluation in LTS6050. Kaplan-Meier method consists in computing probabilities of non-occurrence of event at any observed time of event and multiplying successive probabilities for time ≤t by any earlier computed probabilities to estimate the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t.
Time frame: Up to 10.8 years (EFC6049: 108 weeks + LTS6050: 450 weeks)
Percentage of Participants Free of Sustained Disability Progression (DP)
Sustained DP was defined as sustained increase of at least 1 point from baseline (EFC6049) EDSS score (0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS\>5.5) persisting for at least 12 weeks and 24 weeks. EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that qualifies disability in participants with MS. It consists of 8 ordinal rating scales assessing seven functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder, cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS), where higher scores indicates worse neurological function. Percentage of participants who were considered as free of disability progression confirmed after 12 week sustained progression and 24 week sustained progression were reported. Analysis for this outcome measure was performed on combined data of EFC6049 and LTS6050 study, as pre-specified in protocol.
Time frame: Up to 10.8 years since EFC6049 randomization (EFC6049: 108 weeks + LTS6050: 450 weeks)
Annualized MS Relapse Rate (ARR): Poisson Regression Estimates
ARR was obtained from total number of confirmed relapses that occurred during treatment period divided by sum of treatment durations in LTS6050 study only. Each episode of relapse - appearance, or worsening of a clinical symptom that was stable for at least 30 days, that persisted for a minimum of 24 hours in the absence of fever was to be confirmed by an increase in EDSS score or Functional System (FS) scores. EDSS: an ordinal scale qualifies disability. EDSS total score range: 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). FSS: to assess the neurological function. Total score range: 0 (normal) - 6(worse), higher scores = worse neurological function. To account for the different treatment duration among participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of confirmed relapses as response variable; log transformed treatment duration as "offset" variable; treatment group, region of enrolment and baseline EDSS stratum as covariates).
Time frame: Up to 8 years since LTS6050 randomization
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Volume of Abnormal Lesions (Burden of Disease [BOD]) at Week 192 Since LTS6050 Randomization
BOD was assessed by cerebral MRI and defined as the total volume of all abnormal brain tissue (calculated as the sum of the total volume of T2-lesion component and T1-hypointense lesion component).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 192