In this randomized controlled study the investigators intended to compare analgesic effects of EMLA and/or oral glucose in 60 preterm neonate during arterial function and PICC installation.
It is a randomised controlled clinical trial, double blinded, with the purpose to compare the use of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (lidocaine and prilocaine) and/or the oral solution of glucose 25% in the prevention and treatment of pain in preterm neonates with gestational between 28-37 weeks old. The pain evaluation will be done using NIPS scale, and also physiologic variables (HR, MAP, oxygen saturation level and crie) during two painful procedures performed in the neonatal intensive care units:arterial puncture (n=30) and peripherally inserted central catheters (n=30). All procedures will have clinical indication and will not be implemented by the researcher.The newborns will be randomized into three groups: A (EMLA and glucose; n=20),B (EMLA AND placebo; n=20) and C (anesthetic cream placebo and oral glucose; n=20). All newborns will be subjected to some kind of therapeutic intervention, the objective of this study is validate the application of control measures and treatment of pain for these two procedures that cause mild and moderate pain.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
60
0.5g topical EMLA
Department of Neonatology of Julia Kubitschek Hospital
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Compare analgesic efficacy of EMLA versus oral glucose
Time frame: From the first to seven day of life
Evaluate analgesic synergism of EMLA versus oral glucose
Time frame: First to seven day of life
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.