The purpose of this study is to determine, among adults and in the total population, the effects of offering a choice of FluMist or trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV) in the employer setting when compared to a control group.
The primary objective is to determine, among adults in the 18-49 year old population and in the total population, the effects of offering a choice of FluMist or TIV with and without enhanced advertisement/added incentive on the overall influenza vaccination rates in the employer setting when compared to a control group.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
4,411
An intervention arm offering choice of TIV or FluMist with baseline advertisement, including advertisement to highlight the availability of FluMist
An intervention arm offering choice of TIV or FluMist with enhanced advertisement and additional incentives for receiving an influenza vaccination
A control arm of usual care offering TIV with baseline advertisement
Overall Vaccination Rate, All Ages
Time frame: 30Sep2008 through 23Dec2008
Overall Vaccination Rate, Employees 18 to 49 Years of Age
Time frame: 30Sep2008 through 23Dec2008
Change in Influenza Vaccination Rate From Baseline Season to Intervention Season in the Total Population
Rate difference by arm from baseline to intervention season
Time frame: 2007-2008 season through 2008-2009 season
Change in Influenza Vaccination Rate From Baseline Season to Intervention Season in Employees 18-49 Years of Age
Rate difference by arm from baseline to intervention season
Time frame: 2007-2008 season through 2008-2009 season
Percent of Eligible Participants 18-49 Years of Age Choosing FluMist During Intervention Season
Time frame: 30Sep2008 through 23Dec2008
Characteristics of Participants 18-49 Years of Age Choosing FluMist vs TIV: Race
Percent of participants 18-49 years of age who chose FluMist vs TIV for influenza vaccination and who self-identified as white
Time frame: 30Sep2008 through 23Dec2008
Characteristics of Participants 18-49 Years of Age Choosing FluMist vs TIV: Education
Percent of participants 18-49 years of age who chose FluMist vs TIV for influenza vaccination and who self-identified as college graduates.
Time frame: 30Sep2008 through 23Dec2008
Characteristics of Participants 18-49 Years of Age Choosing FluMist vs TIV: Gender
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Unnamed facility
Chatsworth, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Novato, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Sacramento, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Sacramento, California, United States
Unnamed facility
San Francisco, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Santa Clara, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Santa Monica, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Sunnyvale, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Thousand Oaks, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Boulder, Colorado, United States
...and 37 more locations
Percent of participants 18-49 years of age who chose FluMist vs TIV for influenza vaccination and who self-identified as male.
Time frame: 30Sep2008 through 23Dec2008