The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of AZX100 Drug Product and to determine whether it was effective in preventing or reducing scars that were made from trocars following arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
150
Patients in the Placebo-only arm were dosed intradermally with placebo (saline) in three trocar sites on Day 9 (plus/minus 2 days) and Day 21 (plus/minus 2 days) after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. In the AZX100-placebo arm, 3 or 10 mg or placebo (saline) was administered intradermally at each of three trocar sites on each patient 9 ± 2 days and 21 ± 2 days after arthroscopic surgery. The three trocar sites (anterior, lateral, and posterior sides of the shoulder) were randomized to receive the same dose of study agent for both dose administrations.
AZX100 Drug Product 3 or 10 mg or placebo (saline) was administered intradermally at each of three trocar sites on each patient 9 ± 2 days and 21 ± 2 days after arthroscopic surgery. The three trocar sites (anterior, lateral, and posterior sides of the shoulder) were randomized to receive the same dose of study agent for both dose administrations.
Lotus Clinical Research, Inc.
Pasadena, California, United States
Florida Research Associates
DeLand, Florida, United States
Atlas Orthopedics & Sports Medicine
Orlando, Florida, United States
Orthopaedics East, PA
Greenville, North Carolina, United States
Differences Among the 3 Dosage Groups in the Patient (PSAS) and Observer (OSAS) Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) Scores
Efficacy was based on the difference between mean POSAS scores of placebo and 3 mg AZX100, and placebo and 10 mg AZX100 12 months after shoulder surgery. Three trocar sites were randomized on each patient to receive AZX100 3 mg or AZX100 10 mg or placebo at 9 days and 21 days after shoulder surgery. PSAS results included patients' ratings on a scale of 1-10 (1 was normal skin or no complaints and 10 was the worst imaginable scar or the worst difference) for the following: Is the scar painful? Is the scar itching? Is the color of the scar different? Is the scar more stiff? Is the thickness of the scar different? Is the scar irregular? The possible minimum score was 6 and the maximum (worst) score was 60. OSAS results included observers' ratings on a scale of 1-10 (1 was normal skin and 10 was the worst scar imaginable) for vascularization, pigmentation, thickness, relief, and pliability. The possible minimum score was 5 and the possible maximum (worst) score was 50.
Time frame: 12 months
Between-group Mean Differences in Visual Analog Scale Scores Rated by Independent Blinded Raters Using 3D Photography
Three trocar sites were randomized on each patient to receive AZX100 3 mg/cm or AZX100 10 mg/cm or saline placebo/cm at 9 days and 21 days after surgery. Twelve months after surgery, images of the trocar sites were longitudinally evaluated and rated using a standard 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) by two blinded independent dermatologists, with 0 being normal skin and 100 being the worst scar imaginable. Efficacy was based on the difference between VAS scores of placebo and 3 mg AZX100 and placebo and 10 mg AZX100 for each of the two raters separately. Data from both raters was not combined.
Time frame: 12 months
Between-group Mean Differences in Objective Measures Via 3D Photography (Elevation, Length, Width)
Three trocar sites designated as anterior, lateral and posterior were randomized on each patient to receive AZX100 3 mg/cm or AZX100 10 mg/cm or placebo/cm at 9 days and 21 days following shoulder surgery. 3D digital photography of each trocar scar was used to calculate scar length, width, minimum elevation, and maximum elevation in millimeters (mm) at 12 months. The minimum elevation value was calculated as the lowest point of the scar below the interpolated smooth skin surface. This was always a negative number. Negative values (closer to zero) were more desirable. The maximum elevation value was the highest point of the scar above the interpolated smooth skin surface. A smaller value was preferred.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Texas Orthopedics, Sports & Rehab Assoc.
Austin, Texas, United States
Time frame: 12 months
Between-group Mean Differences in Objective Measures Via 3D Photography (Volume)
Three trocar sites designated as anterior, lateral and posterior were randomized on each patient to receive AZX100 3 mg/cm, or AZX100 10 mg/cm, or placebo/cm at 9 days and 21 days following shoulder surgery. 3D digital photography of each trocar scar was used to calculate positive volume, negative volume, and total volume in millimeters cubed (mm\^3) at 12 months. Positive volume included the scar volume that was calculated to be above the interpolated smooth skin surface. A smaller value was preferred. Negative volume included the volume of the scar calculated to be below the interpolated smooth skin surface. It was always a negative number; negative values (closer to zero) were more desirable. Total volume was calculated as the sum of positive volume and the absolute value of negative volume. Smaller values were more desirable.
Time frame: 12 months
Histological Evaluation of Collagen
Three trocar sites designated as anterior, lateral and posterior were randomized on each patient to receive AZX100 3 mg/cm or AZX100 10 mg/cm or placebo/cm at 9 days and 21 days following shoulder surgery. A skin punch biopsy was taken of each trocar site at 12 months. The specimens were blindly scored in duplicate by a dermal pathologist for dermal collagen fiber density, maturity and orientation, where 0% was completely normal and 100% was completely abnormal.
Time frame: 12 months
Histological Evaluation of Number of Alpha Smooth Muscle Actin Cells
Three trocar sites designated as anterior, lateral and posterior were randomized on each patient to receive AZX100 3 mg/cm or AZX100 10 mg/cm or placebo/cm at 9 days and 21 days following shoulder surgery. A skin punch biopsy was taken of each trocar site at 12 months. For exploratory purposes, the specimens were blindly scored in duplicate by a dermal pathologist for the estimated number of alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) positive cells per high powered field. Values ranged from 0 to several hundred. The number of α-SMA cells was assessed for exploratory purposes; therefore, at the time of this report, it was not known whether it was better to have a low or high α-SMA score.
Time frame: 12 months