The main objective of this study is to prospectively evaluate the safety, probable benefit, and effectiveness of the PHAROS Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System in a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. A secondary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of stenting in the neurovasculature to treat cerebral ischemia on other outcomes such as hospital length of stay, charges, and costs.
1.1 Study Hypothesis Treatment of cerebral or retinal ischemia due to plaque in the neurovasculature using the PHAROS Vitesse Stent System plus medical therapy will provide additional clinical benefit over medical therapy alone. 1.2 Primary Effectiveness Endpoint The primary effectiveness endpoint consists of a composite of the two following outcomes: * Stroke in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event within 12 months of randomization * Hard TIA in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event from day 2 through month 12 post-randomization 1.3 Safety Outcomes Safety outcomes to be collected and reported as part of the overall risk-to-benefit profile for this device are: * Stroke in any territory within 30 days of randomization * Death from any cause within 30 days of randomization * Hard TIA in any territory occurring after a 24 hour post-procedure stabilization period (days 2-30) since the recovery from anesthesia can mask accurate assessment of possible TIA symptoms. * Intracranial hemorrhage within 30 days of randomization 1.4 Other Outcomes * Stent Success - PHAROS Vitesse stent deployed across target lesion with residual stenosis 0-20% * Percentage of Stent Group Subjects with any (symptomatic or asymptomatic) in-stent restenosis ≥ 70% confirmed by angiogram at 12 months * Percentage of Stent Group Subjects with symptomatic in-stent restenosis ≥ 70% confirmed by angiogram at 12 months * Percentage of Medical Therapy Group Subjects with interventional procedure (e.g., angioplasty or stent) at 12 months * Comparison of NIHSS scores between treatment arms * Comparison of mRS scores between treatment arms
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
125
Implantation of one or more balloon-expandable Pharos Vitesse stents to treat neurovascular ischemic lesions + Medical therapy \[Treatment with aspirin (81-325 mg daily for the duration of the study) and Clopidogrel (75 mg daily for first 3 months)\]
Medical therapy alone \[Treatment with aspirin (81-325 mg daily for the duration of the study) and Clopidogrel (75 mg daily for first 3 months)\]
Successful Outcome: No Stroke or Hard TIA in the Same Territory Within 12 Months
The primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of the two following outcomes: * Stroke in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event within 12 months of randomization * Hard Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event from day 2 through month 12 post-randomization A subject was deemed to be a primary endpoint success if neither of these outcomes occurred. The Kaplan-Meier success rate at 12-months post-operatively was calculated with Kaplan-Meier time-to-event methodology, where the time variable for patients who were successful (no stroke within 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months) was censored at the time of last follow-up, and the time variable for patients who were not successful (had a stroke within 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months) was censored at the time of the first event (stroke with 12 months or hard TIA between 2 days and 12 months).
Time frame: One Year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.