Light Endoscopic Robot evaluation in abdominal and urological laparoscopic surgery : surgery with surgeon and robot (REL group = new treatment) versus surgery with surgeon and assistant (AO group - standard treatment) Primary outcome measure : Number of useful hands (light endoscopic robot = one useful mechanical hand)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
78
comparison of two different laparoscopic surgeries : robot versus human
University Hospital, Grenoble
Grenoble, Isère, France
University Hospital, Saint-Etienne
Saint-Étienne-de-Montluc, Pays de la Loire Region, France
Number of useful hands, robot as a useful mechanical hand
Time frame: one month
To evaluate reliability and limits of light endoscopic robot : Number of breakdown, failure (manipulation, voice recognition, other )
Time frame: one month
Compare surgeon's visual comfort in two groups (REL group and AO group) : evaluate scale of surgeon's visual comfort during surgery
Time frame: one month
Compare surgery's periods
Time frame: one month
Evaluate complications : Number of complications (per operative, post operative)
Time frame: one month
Evaluate medical and paramedical use of light endoscopic robot : apprentice time, labour time
Time frame: one month
Medical and economic evaluation : cost benefit analysis : human cost, cost
Time frame: one month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.