The purpose of this study is to compare pain threshold, pain tolerance, and wind up, as measured by QST, before and after a single dose of ketamine infusion under two clinical conditions: chronic pain patients on opioid therapy and chronic pain patients without opioid therapy.
We hypothesize that: 1. Chronic pain patients on chronic opioids would have a lower pain threshold and lower pain tolerance when compared to opioid naïve patients (patients with chronic pain with non-opioids treatment)., as measured by QST in a non-affected neutral limb; 2. Chronic pain patients on chronic opioids would have an increased response to painful stimulation, so called "windup" as demonstrated by QST; 3. Both "wind-up" and altered pain threshold and tolerance would be indicative of the presence of opioid-induced hyperalgesia; 4. Intravenous ketamine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, could be used to differentiate between opioid-induced hyperalgesia and opioid tolerance.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
79
To compare pain threshold, pain tolerance, and wind up, as measured by QST, before and after a single dose of ketamine infusion under two clinical conditions: chronic pain patients on opioid therapy and chronic pain patients without opioid therapy.
To compare pain threshold, pain tolerance, and wind up, as measured by QST, before and after a single dose of ketamine infusion under two clinical conditions: chronic pain patients on opioid therapy and chronic pain patients without opioid therapy.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Change in Temperature of Pain Threshold
We measured the change in pain threshold using Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST). QST refers to a set of quantitative testing of individual responses to mechanical, thermal, and/or electrical stimulation. In this study, pain threshold was the thermal stimulation intensity (in°C) first perceived as painful. To measure this, a contact thermode was attached onto the dorsal surface of the forearm. By pressing a computer mouse button, each subject was able to stop stimulation when they first perceived a painful stimulation from the thermode as the temperature increased 1°C/s. This test was repeated 3 times and an average temperature was calculated. The temperatures could range from a minimum of 0°C to 53°C.
Time frame: Baseline at visit 1, post inufsion at visit 1, and at visit 2 which was 1 week after visit 1
Change in Temperature of Pain Tolerance
Using QST, we measured the change in pain tolerance which was the maximum thermal stimulation intensity (in °C) tolerable. In this test, the subject was instructed to press the computer mouse to stop stimulation when the thermode reached the maximal tolerable temperature. This test was repeated 3 times and an average temperature was calculated. The temperatures could range from a minimum of 0°C to 53°C.
Time frame: Baseline at visit 1, post inufsion at visit 1, and at visit 2 which was 1 week after visit 1
Change in Duration of Supra-threshold Pain Tolerance
Using QST, we detected the duration (seconds) of tolerance to supra-threshold heat pain stimulation. In this test, subjects were asked to tolerate, as long as he or she could, heat stimulation preset at 47°C for a maximum of 60 seconds. They were given the computer mouse to stop the test if they reached their limit before 60 seconds. If they stopped the test before the 60 seconds, the time that they stopped it was recorded. This test was repeated 3 times and an average duration was calculated. The duration could range from a minimum of 0 seconds to a maximum of 60 seconds.
Time frame: Baseline at visit 1, post inufsion at visit 1, and at visit 2 which was 1 week after visit 1
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.