The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to compare pain, functional outcome and ranges of motion of the knees in patients receiving either a standard posterior cruciate-retaining or a high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prosthesis.
The main goals of total knee arthroplasty are pain relief and improvement of function and range of motion. The purpose of this study was to compare ranges of motion of the knees in patients receiving either a standard posterior crucaite-retaining or a high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prosthesis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
54
comparison of functional outcome in patients receiving either NexGen posterior cruciate-retaining or a high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prosthesis
TKR using Nexgen CR-flex implant
Change in Knee Society Knee Score
change in knee score will be compared with baseline and follow up of 3 years. The knee society knee score range from 0 to 100 points, 100 being the best possible outcome. Baseline-NexGen (CR) knee socre:29 points Baseline-NexGen (CR-Flex) knee socre:29 points Follow up of 3 years-NexGen (CR) knee socre: 93.7 points Follow up of 3 years-NexGen (CR-Flex) knee socre: 93.9 points
Time frame: baseline and 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.