The purpose of this study is to compare the long-term clinical and radiological results of operative and conservative treatment of Tossy type 3 acromio-clavicular dislocation.
The optimal treatment of Rockwood type 3 AC joint injuries is still controversial. This controversy results from the low level of evidence of the early literature and the evaluation of all AC joint injuries with a type I through III classification system. There are no prospective randomized controlled long-term studies on the treatment of Tossy type 3 AC dislocation using primary repair and minimal pin fixation. In this study, the non-surgical treatment consisted of immobilisation of the injured AC-joint in a Kenny-Howard-type splint for four weeks. The surgical treatment consisted of an open reduction and fixation of the AC joint with two smooth Kirschner wires (2 mm in diameter) across the AC-joint. The K-wires were bent at the proximal ends, with suturing of the superior AC ligament.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
39
The non-surgical treatment consisted of immobilisation of the injured AC-joint in a Kenny-Howard-type splint for four weeks. The patient was encouraged in mobilisation of the elbow several times per day and the mobilisation of the shoulder with pendulum type movements were initiated four weeks after the injury. Active mobilisation of the shoulder was allowed six weeks after the injury.
The surgical treatment was accomplished within two days after the injury, and it consisted of an open reduction and fixation of the AC joint with two smooth Kirschner wires (2 mm in diameter) across the AC-joint. The K-wires were bent at the proximal ends, with suturing of the superior AC ligament. The position of Kirschner wires was confirmed during the operation using C-arm transillumination. The articular disc of AC joint was removed if it was damaged. Postoperative care consisted of immobilisation of the AC joint in a sling, (Polysling, body band) for four weeks and the mobilisation of the shoulder started four to six weeks later in a similar manner as in the non-operative group.
Kuopio University Hospital
Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland
Presence of delayed surgical procedure to treat the AC joint dislocation pathology
Time frame: from 18 to 20 years
Grading of the AC dislocation using Rockwood classification (3-6)
Time frame: 18-20 years
AC joint width in the middle of the joint (mm)
Time frame: 18-20 years
Distance between proc. coracoideus and clavicle (coracoclavicular interspace) in Zanca projection, compared to non-injured side(mm)
Time frame: 18-20 years
Osteolysis of clavicle (none, mild, moderate, severe) for follow-up radiographs
Time frame: 18-20 years
Presence of calcification of CC ligaments (yes/no)
Time frame: 18-20 years
Osteoarthrosis using modified Kellgren-Lawrence classification for follow-up radiographs
Time frame: 18-20 years
Other pathologic condition of the shoulder (eg. osteoarthrosis of the glenohumeral joint, elevation of the humerus, calcific deposits of cuff) and the description of it
Time frame: 18-20 years
The source (mechanism) of the AC dislocation injury (eg. falling, collision
Time frame: 0 day
Patient age at the time of injury (years)
Time frame: 0 day
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Patient weight (kg)
Time frame: 18 - 20 years
Patient length (cm)
Time frame: 18 - 20 years
Occupation
Time frame: 18 - 20 years
Grading of the work (light, heavy work, retired)
Time frame: 18 - 20 years
Presence of other pathologic conditions or operative treatments for the shoulder, AC joint or other part of shoulder, description of it
Time frame: 18 - 20 years
Larsen score
Time frame: 18-20 years
Simple Shoulder Test (SST)
Time frame: 18-20 years
UCLA score
Time frame: 18-20 years
Constant score
Time frame: 18-20 years
Oxford score
Time frame: 18-20 years
Instability experiences of the AC joint (none, sometimes = less than 10 times a year, often = more than 10 times year)
Time frame: 18-20 years
Pain (VAS, cm) related to instability experience of AC joint
Time frame: 18-30 years
Range of motion of the shoulder (flexion, abduction, horizontal adduction, degrees
Time frame: 18-20 years
Palpation of the AC joint (normal, prominent but stable, unstable)
Time frame: 18-20 years
Pain of palpation (no or yes)
Time frame: 18-20 years
Cross arm test (pain in AC joint, no/yes)
Time frame: 18-20 years
Other pathologic findings of the shoulder in the clinical examination and the description of it
Time frame: 18-20 years