The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and performance of the Sinexus Intranasal Splint when used following Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) in patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis.
This was a prospective, multi-center, double blind trial that enrolled patients in three groups as described below. Two groups (Pilot 15 mm and Efficacy 25 mm) used a randomized, double-blind, intra-patient control study design to assess performance of the drug-coated Splint (received in one ethmoid sinus) compared to the control Splint (received in the contralateral ethmoid). The other group of patients (Safety/PK 25 mm) received bilateral drug-coated Splints, and served as a pharmacokinetics (PK) study group.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
50
placement of non-coated intranasal splint following FESS
placement of Sinexus Intranasal Splint placed following FESS
Central California Ear, Nose, Throat
Fresno, California, United States
Device Success Rate
Device success rate defined as a ratio where the numerator is the number of successful deployments of the Sinexus Intranasal Splint and the denominator is the number of attempted sinuses. Deployment was considered successful if the implant procedure concluded with a successful splint placement on the intended side.
Time frame: Baseline
Reduction in Ethmoid Sinus Inflammation
Inflammation was scored by the physician using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during endoscopic evaluation with range of 0 to 100mm. The term inflammation was used as a global descriptor defined to include mucosal edema, erythema, hypertrophy and polypoid changes. 0 represented no inflammation and 100mm was defined as "Severe, involving significant and extensive erythema and edema and/or hypertrophy and/or polypoid changes".
Time frame: 21 days
Middle Turbinate Lateralization
Position of the middle turbinate was assessed using a 4-point categorical scale (medialized, normal, partially lateralized, lateralized). For Lateralized Middle Turbinate, a sinus is counted once if this occurs at least once during the 30 Day timeframe. Lateralized Middle Turbinate (worse outcome), if left unaddressed, is often the cause of sinus obstruction.
Time frame: 30 days
Middle Meatus Patency
Patency of the middle meatus was assessed using a 3-point categorical scale (patent, narrowed, obstructed). Analysis included patent (better outcome) vs narrowed/obstructed (worse outcome).
Time frame: 30 days
Significant Adhesion Occurrence
Adhesion formation was assessed using a 5-point categorical scale (none, small/non-obstructing, obstructing/easily separated, \*dense/obstructing/difficult to separate, \*severe/complete adhesion to lateral nasal wall) with "significant adhesion" denoted by \*
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 30 days
Polypoid Tissue Changes
Polyp formation in the ethmoid sinus assessed using an accepted 5-point categorical scale: 0-no visible nasal polyp (NP), 1-small amount NP confined in the middle meatus (MM); 2-multiple NP confined in MM; 3-NP extending beyond MM, within the sphenoethmoid recess not totally obstructing, or both; 4-NP completely obstructing the nasal cavity. 0 is best, and 4 is worst. When a patient's sinus has a change in polyp score at Day 30 it is counted as one.
Time frame: 30 days