This study is designed to perform a head-to-head comparison of two synthetic ceramic bone graft substitutes, bioactive glass (BAG) and beta-tricalcium phosphate (TCP), in filling of contained bone defects following surgical evacuation of benign bone tumor or tumor-like conditions. Based on the investigators' previous preclinical research and an ongoing single-center randomized clinical trial on bioactive glass filling, the investigators expect BAG filling to be more efficient compared to TCP in promotion of defect healing and functional recovery after surgery.
This study is designed to perform a head-to-head comparison of two synthetic ceramic bone graft substitutes, bioactive glass (BAG) and beta-tricalcium phosphate (TCP), in filling of contained bone defects following surgical evacuation of benign bone tumor or tumor-like conditions. Small metacarpal and phalangeal enchondromas (Stratum I) and large long-bone lesions (Stratum II) will be evaluated separately. Aside with the head-to-head comparison of the two synthetic bone graft substitutes, autologous bone graft (Stratum I) and allogeneic bone graft (Stratum II) will be used as the standard of care controls.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
120
Surgical implantation
Surgical implantation
Surgical transplantation from iliac crest
Helsinki University Hospital
Helsinki, Finland
Kuopio University Hospital
Kuopio, Finland
Oulu University Hospital
Oulu, Finland
Tampere University Hsopital
Tampere, Finland
Turku University Central Hospital
Stratum I: Hand-grip strength test
Hand and finger grip strength measured by a standard device
Time frame: 3 months
Stratum II: Healing of cortical bone window based on CT scan evaluation
CT-evaluation of cortical defect healing
Time frame: 6 months
Biomaterial incorporation assessed with radiographs
Radiographic evaluation of bioactive glass and bone graft incorporation
Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months
Pain intensity (VAS)
Evaluation of postoperative pain
Time frame: 3,6, and 12 months
Stratum I: DASH-questionnaire
Evaluation of patient-related outcome
Time frame: 3,6, and 12 months
RAND-36
Evaluation of patient-related outcome
Time frame: 3,6, and 12 months
Surgical wound healing
Clinical evaluation of surgical wound healing
Time frame: 0-3 months
Soft tissue complications
Clinical evaluation of soft tissue complications in the surgical area
Time frame: 0-12 months
Bone complications
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of complications of bone defect healing
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Surgical transplantation
Turku, Finland
Time frame: 0-12 months