Purpose: This is a pilot study to evaluate HIV viremia and persistence in acutely HIV infected antiretroviral naïve patients treated with Darunavir/ritonavir and Etravirine Participants: 20 participants, age 18 and older, HIV infected, antiretroviral naïve patients Procedures (methods): ARV treatment with Darunavir/ritonavir and Etravirine, Optional studies: Genital secretion samples, Cerebrospinal fluid samples, Leukapheresis, Endoscopy/colonoscopy
Study Design This is a multicenter, single arm, 48-week open-label pilot study of DRV/R \& ETR in acute HIV infection. Study sites will be members of the Duke-UNC Acute HIV Infection Study Consortium. If baseline resistance is detected after treatment begins (e.g. evidence of pre-existing baseline resistance (genotypic or phenotypic) that may adversely affect the efficacy of the study regimen), the patient may elect to alter treatment as per best clinical practice. The new regimen will not be provided by the study, but will be obtained for the participant through available clinical resources. After patients are identified with acute HIV infection, they will be offered the opportunity to participate in the study. Patients will also be offered the opportunity to co-enroll in CHAVI 001 and 012, studies that follow the virological and immunological response of patients with AHI, regardless of the initiation of ART. An overall consent form will be signed for study participation, and separate informed consents with signatures will be obtained for optional studies. Patients will be eligible for participation after signing the overall consent - agreeing to participate in studies of other compartment specimens is not required for enrollment. At the initial visit, patient eligibility will be confirmed with appropriate laboratory testing (see "STUDY POPULATION"). When eligibility is verified, entry laboratory studies will be obtained, and the participants will be started on DRV/r, and ETR. All participants will be followed at regular intervals thereafter as specified in the schedule of evaluations. Participants meeting criteria for virologic failure will be offered the opportunity to switch to the best available regimen as selected by their HIV provider. Hypothesis Combination therapy with DRV/R \& ETR will suppress plasma viremia and improve immunologic function in antiretroviral (ART)-naïve, acutely HIV-infected (AHI) patients, and will limit replication in HIV-1 cellular compartments.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
15
800 mg orally once daily
100 mg orally once daily
200 mg orally twice daily, although patients may choose to take ETR 400 mg QD to have a simpler all QD regimen
The University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Number of Participants With Virologic Response
Virologic response defined as plasma HIV RNA measurement \<200 copies/mL at week 24
Time frame: 24 weeks
Number of Participants With Virologic Response
Virologic response to study treatment defined as plasma HIV RNA measurement \<50 copies/mL at week 48
Time frame: 48 weeks from enrollment
Median Change in CD4 Cell Count From Week 0 to Week 24.
Time frame: week 0, week 24
Median Change in CD4 Cell Count From Week 0 to Week 48.
Time frame: 48 weeks from enrollment
HIV RNA Levels Immediately Prior to Initiating Study Treatment.
Time frame: HIV RNA level at enrollment
Median Time to HIV RNA Suppression to <200 Copies/mL
Time frame: From enrollment to the date of HIV RNA suppression, assessed up to Week 48
HIV RNA Detection in Semen
Total cumulative levels of HIV RNA detected in the semen of participants from enrollment through week 48.
Time frame: From enrollment through 48 weeks
Number of Participants Who Stopped Study Treatment Due to Adverse Event or Intolerance
Time frame: Enrollment to Week 48
Adverse Events Possibly or Definitely Related to Study Treatment Through Week 48
Total number of adverse events observed that were possibly or definitely related to study treatment through week 48
Time frame: Enrollment to week 48
Maximum Etravirine Exposure in Cerebrospinal Fluid Among Participants Who Consented to an Optional Lumbar Puncture
Time frame: Week 4 and week 48
Minimum Etravirine Exposure in Cerebrospinal Fluid Among Participants Who Consented to an Optional Lumbar Puncture
Time frame: Week 4 and week 48
Maximum Darunavir Exposure in Cerebrospinal Fluid Among Participants Who Consented to an Optional Lumbar Puncture
Time frame: Week 4 and week 48
Minimum Darunavir Exposure in Cerebrospinal Fluid Among Participants Who Consented to an Optional Lumbar Puncture
Time frame: Week 4 and week 48
Maximum Ritonavir Exposure in Cerebrospinal Fluid Among Participants Who Consented to an Optional Lumbar Puncture
Time frame: Week 4 and Week 48
Minimum Ritonavir Exposure Range in Cerebrospinal Fluid Among Participants Who Consented to an Optional Lumbar Puncture
Time frame: Week 4 and week 48
Maximum Etravirine Exposure in Semen Among Participants Who Consented to an Optional Collection of Semen
Time frame: Weeks 0-4 and weeks 12, 48
Minimum Etravirine Exposure in Semen Among Participants Who Consented to an Optional Collection of Semen
Time frame: Weeks 0-4 and weeks 12, 48
Maximum Darunavir Exposure in Semen Among Participants Who Consented to an Optional Collection of Semen
Time frame: Weeks 0-4 and weeks 12, 48
Minimum Darunavir Exposure Range in Semen Among Participants Who Consented to an Optional Collection of Semen
Time frame: Weeks 0-4 and weeks 12, 48
Maximum Ritonavir Exposure in Semen Among Participants Who Consented to an Optional Collection of Semen
Time frame: Weeks 0-4 and Weeks 12, 48
Minimum Ritonavir Exposure in Semen Among Participants Who Consented to an Optional Collection of Semen
Time frame: Weeks 0-4 and Weeks 12, 48
Maximum Etravirine Exposure in Ileal Tissue Among Participants Who Consented to an Optional Gut Biopsy Procedure
Time frame: between Week 4-12 and between Weeks 36-48
Minimum Etravirine Exposure Range in Ileal Tissue Among Participants Who Consented to an Optional Gut Biopsy Procedure
Time frame: between Week 4-12 and between Weeks 36-48
Maximum Darunavir Exposure Range in Ileal Tissue Among Participants Who Consented to an Optional Gut Biopsy Procedure
Time frame: between Week 4-12 and between Weeks 36-48
Minimum Darunavir Exposure Range in Ileal Tissue Among Participants Who Consented to an Optional Gut Biopsy Procedure
Time frame: between week 4-12 and between weeks 36-48
Maximum Ritonavir Exposure Range in Ileal Tissue Among Participants Who Consented to an Optional Gut Biopsy Procedure
Time frame: between week 4-12 and between Weeks 36-48
Minimum Ritonavir Exposure Range in Ileal Tissue Among Participants Who Consented to an Optional Gut Biopsy Procedure
Time frame: between week 4-12 and between weeks 36-48
Number of Participants With HIV RNA Measurement Above the Limits of Detection in Cerebrospinal Fluid
Time frame: Week 4 and Week 48
Number of Participants With Neurocognitive Impairment at Baseline
Time frame: Week 2 or 4
Number of Participants With Neurocognitive Impairment at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants With Neurocognitive Impairment at Week 48
Time frame: Week 48
Overall Neurocognitive Impairment Score at Week 2 or 4
Neuropsychological performance was assessed at Week 2 or 4, Week 24 and Week 48 in the following measures: Premorbid/language (Wide Range Achievement Test 4 -Reading Subtest), Learning (HVLT-R, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised), Memory (HVLT-R), Speed of Processing (Trailmaking A (Army Individual Test Battery, 1944), 1974, Stroop color, Attention (WAIS-III Symbol Search; Stroop word, Fine motor, Executive (Trailmaking B, Stroop interference, Letter, Category Fluency. An overall summary score was created by averaging all tests. Participants also completed the self-reported functional status Patient's Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI) and the Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADLS). Best available demographically corrected normative data were utilized to create z scores. A negative z score denotes below-average performance relative to a US normative comparison population. A higher z score is a better outcome.
Time frame: Week 2 or 4
Overall Neurocognitive Impairment at Week 24
Neuropsychological performance was assessed at week 2 or 4, week 24 and week 48 in the following measures: Premorbid/language (Wide Range Achievement Test 4 -Reading Subtest), Learning (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised), Memory (HVLT-R), Speed of Processing (Trailmaking A (Army Individual Test Battery, 1944), 1974, Stroop color, Attention (WAIS-III Symbol Search; Stroop word, Fine motor, Executive (Trailmaking B, Stroop interference, Letter, Category Fluency. An overall summary score of neurocognitive functioning was created by averaging all tests. Participants also completed Patient's Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI) and the Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADLS). Best available demographically corrected normative data were utilized to create z scores. A negative z score denotes below-average performance relative to a US normative comparison population. A higher z score is a better outcome.
Time frame: Week 24
Overall Neurocognitive Impairment at Week 48
Neuropsychological performance was assessed at baseline (week 2 or 4), week 24 and week 48 in the following domain (measures): Premorbid/language (Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) 4 - Reading Subtest), Learning (HVLT-R, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised), Memory (HVLT-R), Speed of Processing (Trailmaking A (Army Individual Test Battery, 1944), 1974, Stroop color, Attention (WAIS-III Symbol Search; Stroop word, Fine motor, Executive (Trailmaking B, Stroop interference, Letter, Category Fluency. An overall summary score of neurocognitive functioning was created by averaging all tests. Participants also completed the self-reported functional status Patient's Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory (PAOFI) and the Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADLS). Best available demographically corrected normative data were utilized to create z scores. A negative z score denotes below-average performance relative to a US normative comparison population. A higher z score is a better outcome.
Time frame: Week 48
Change in Overall Neurocognitive Impairment From Baseline to Week 24 or 48
Change in overall z score from baseline to week 24 or 48. A negative z score denotes below-average performance relative to a US normative comparison population. A higher z score is a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24 or 48
Correlation of HIV RNA Levels in CSF and Drug Levels With Neurocognitive Functioning
Time frame: From enrollment through Week 48
Correlation of Time to HIV RNA Levels <200 Copies/mL With Improvement in Neurocognitive Functioning From Baseline to Week 24 and 48
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24 and 48
HIV RNA Detection in Ileal Biopsy Specimens
Average HIV RNA detected in the ileal biopsy specimens per participant over weeks 4 and 48.
Time frame: Weeks 4 and 48
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.