The purpose of the study is to see if sorafenib plus best supportive care (i.e. in addition to the non-cancer treatments patients would normally receive) is an effective treatment for lung cancer compared to best supportive care alone. The safety and tolerability of the two treatment groups will also be compared. The goal of the study is to test the ability of sorafenib to improve survival compared to best supportive care alone.
Acronyms used in Adverse Events section: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), International normalized ratio (INR), Atrioventricular (AV), Gastrointestinal (GI), Not otherwise specified (NOS), Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Absolute neutrophil count (ANC), Central nervous system (CNS), Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
703
Sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (BID)
Placebo - 2 tablets twice daily (BID)
Overall Survival
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Overall survival of subjects alive at the time of analysis will be censored at their last date of follow-up or database cut off date whichever came first.
Time frame: From randomization of the first subject until 36 months later
Progression-free Survival
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first observed disease progression (radiological or clinical, whichever is earlier) or death due to any cause, if death occurs before progression is documented. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Appearance of new lesions will also constitute progressive disease. In exceptional circumstances unequivocal progression of a non-measured lesion may be accepted as evidence of disease progression.
Time frame: From randomization of the first subject until 36 months later assessed every 6 weeks
Disease Control
Disease control (DC) was defined as the proportion of patients whose best response was Complete Response \[CR: disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumor (both target and non-target)\] or Partial Response \[PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD\] or Stable Disease \[SD: steady state of disease which was neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progressive Disease (PD)\].
Time frame: From randomization of the first subject until 36 months later assessed every 6 weeks
Objective Tumor Response
Objective tumor response was defined as the proportion of patients whose best response was Complete Response \[CR: disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumor (both target and non-target)\] or Partial Response \[PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD\] over the whole duration of study.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Unnamed facility
Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States
Unnamed facility
Stanford, California, United States
Unnamed facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Unnamed facility
Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Unnamed facility
Buenos Aires, Ciudad Auton. de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Unnamed facility
Córdoba, Córdoba Province, Argentina
Unnamed facility
Córdoba, Córdoba Province, Argentina
Unnamed facility
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina
Unnamed facility
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina
Unnamed facility
Santa Fé, Argentina
...and 172 more locations
Time frame: From randomization of the first subject until 36 months later assessed every 6 weeks
Time to Progression
Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first observed disease progression (radiological or clinical, whichever is earlier).
Time frame: From randomization of the first subject until 36 months later assessed every 6 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire for Palliative Care (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL) - Global Health Status
The EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL is an abbreviated 15-item version of the EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) developed for use in palliative care. The 'Global Health status' subscale consists of question 15 of the questionnaire. The score of 'Global Health status' ranges from 0 (very poor) to 100 (excellent). The change of score ranges from -100 (maximum degree of worsening) to 100 (maximum degree of improvement).
Time frame: Baseline and up to End of treatment (up to Cycle 41, 21 days per cycle)
Mean Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-LC13) - Coughing Subscale
A clinically valid 13-item tool for assessing disease- and treatment-specific symptoms in lung cancer patients in clinical trials. The coughing subscale uses question 1 of the questionnaire. The scale ranges from 0 to 100. Higher score means higher level of symptomatology/problems. The change of score ranges from -100 (decrease in level of symptomatology/problems) to 100 (increase in level of symptomatology/problems).
Time frame: Baseline and up to End of treatment (up to Cycle 41, 21 days per cycle)
Mean Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-LC13) - Dyspnea
A clinically valid 13-item tool for assessing disease- and treatment-specific symptoms in lung cancer patients in clinical trials. The dyspnea subscale uses questions 3, 4 and 5 of the questionnaire. The scale ranges from 0 to 100. Higher score means higher level of symptomatology/problems. The change of score ranges from -100 (decrease in level of symptomatology/problems) to 100 (increase in level of symptomatology/problems).
Time frame: Baseline and up to End of treatment (up to Cycle 41, 21 days per cycle)
Mean Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) - Index Score
The Euro-Qol 5D (EQ-5D) is a validated assessment tool of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and utilities consisting of 15 statements. Patients select those statements that best describe their current health state regarding mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression which is converted into a utility value. Range of scale is from -0.594 (worst possible health state) to 1 (perfect health) based on UK weights. The change of score ranges from -1.594 (high degree of worsening) to 1.594 (high degree of improvement).
Time frame: Baseline and up to End of treatment (up to Cycle 41, 21 days per cycle)
Mean Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) - VAS Score
A visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) used by patients to rate their current health state from 100 (best imaginable health state) to 0 (worst imaginable health state). The change of score ranges from -100 (high degree of worsening) to 100 (high degree of improvement)
Time frame: Baseline and up to End of treatment (up to Cycle 41, 21 days per cycle)