The study compares three treatment modalities in a human model of Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS): beta-blockers, I(f)-blockers, and placebo.
Elevated heart rate may lead to cardiac disease in the long-term. Therefore, drugs lowering heart rate are useful. Beta-blockers are an established treatment modality. They not only lower heart rate but also contractility, which might be undesirable in certain tachycardic disorders. Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) patients complain about dizziness, weakness, headache, lightheadedness, fatigue, nausea, and presyncope. In some patients there is elevated heart rate even during supine rest. In POTS patients it is preferable to lower heart rate without reducing cardiac contractility which can be achieved by using so-called I(f)-blockers. Thus, they might be superior to beta-blockers in POTS. In our study, we artificially generate POTS in healthy male subjects for about 48 hours. We want to compare the cardiovascular effects and orthostatic tolerance of the following treatments: beta-blocker, I(f)-blocker, and placebo. Moreover, we will quantify changes in cardiovascular autonomic regulation brought about by I(f)-blockade versus placebo.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
40
Franz-Volhard Centrum für Klinische Forschung
Berlin, Germany
RECRUITINGMedizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, Germany
RECRUITINGSub-study 'Orthostatic tolerance': Change in heart rate after 20 mins of passive orthostasis. Sub-study 'Sympathetic system': arterial pressure related heart rate
Time frame: 12-18 hours
'Orthostatic tolerance': Hemodynamics during head-up tilt. Time to presyncope.
Time frame: 12-18 hours
'Sympathetic system': Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA).
Time frame: 12-18 hours
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.