The purpose of this study is to determine if a combination of neoadjuvant dutasteride and bicalutamide has the same efficacy and less toxicity than standard treatment with an LHRH agonist and bicalutamide for prostate cytoreduction prior to permanent implant brachytherapy.
Permanent implant prostate brachytherapy is recognized as the treatment method for prostate cancer that results in the least amount of sexual side effects including erectile dysfunction (ED). However prostate brachytherapy is often limited to patients with a prostate volume less than 50cc because of dosimetric and technical considerations. To counter this fact patients with a prostate larger than 50cc are offered neoadjuvant hormonal therapy to reduce their prostate volume to a value less than 50cc. The pharmacological method most often employed involves treatment with an LHRH agonist, which also involves multiple adverse effects for patients including ED in the majority of patients. This approach may also involve other disadvantages including a possibility of increased cardiovascular mortality a possible increase in urinary toxicity and a reduction in health-related quality of life in patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Despite theses facts, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy remains essentially the sole method used to reduce prostate volume prior to prostate brachytherapy. One study has evaluated the efficacy of a neoadjuvant regimen without an LHRH agonist, comprised of Dutasteride and Bicalutamide to reduce prostate volume. This treatment could theoretically have fewer effects on sexual function and quality of life and could also possibly reduce urinary toxicity of brachytherapy. Nonetheless, these factors have never been evaluated. The cytoreductive efficacy of Bicalutamide and Dutasteride have never been directly compared to standard treatments. The current study is necessary to determine the effects of a neoadjuvant regimen of Bicalutamide and Dutasteride on prostate volume, sexual function, urinary toxicity and quality of life as compared to standard treatment. If it can be determined that there is an advantage with Bicalutamide and Dutasteride this regimen could become a standard of care for prostate cytoreduction prior to brachytherapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
60
3-month treatment with an LHRH agonist chosen by the treating radiation oncologist and Bicalutamide 50 mg daily for the first month of treatment with the LHRH agonist.
Dutasteride given at dose of 0.5 mg daily starting three months prior to day of implant procedure and continued for 3 months up until procedure. Bicalutamide: given at a dose of 50 mg daily for 3 the same 3 month period as dutasteride Tamoxifen: given at dose of 10 mg daily for 3 months that dutasteride and bicalutamide are administered.
CHUQ- Hotel-Dieu de Quebec
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Total prostate volume
Trans rectal ultra sound 3 dimensional volume evaluation
Time frame: 3 months after start of therapy
EPIC questionnaire urinary function and bother scores
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
Time frame: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
EPIC questionnaire sexual function and bother scores
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
Time frame: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
EPIC questionnaire bowel function and bother scores
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
Time frame: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
EPIC questionnaire hormonal function and bother scores
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
Time frame: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
IPSS scores
International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS)
Time frame: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Acute urinary retention rates
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
Time frame: 0 to 6 months post-implant
SF-12 Quality of life questionnaire results
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
International Quality of Life Assessment - Short Form
Time frame: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Rate of gynecomastia and breast tenderness
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
Time frame: 6 weeks pre-implant, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Serum testosterone
testosterone blood level
Time frame: 3 months pre-implant, pre-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Anemia
haemoglobin blood level
Time frame: baseline, pre-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Abnormal liver function tests
Blood level of Alanine transaminase (ALT), Aspartate transaminase (AST), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), Bilirubin, Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), L-lactate dehydrogenase (LD).
Time frame: 6 weeks pre-implant, pre-implant, 3 months post-implant
Serum PSA
serum testosterone blood level
Time frame: baseline, pre-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Adverse events recording
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
Time frame: 6 weeks pre-implant, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant