This prospective annual release study was designed to assess the safety of a monovalent influenza virus vaccine using a new strain recommended for the 2009-2010 influenza season not previously contained in the trivalent intranasal FluMist vaccine. Three hundred healthy adults received a single dose of vaccine or placebo and were followed for 180 days.
This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled release study enrolled 300 healthy adults 18 to 49 years of age. Eligible participants were randomly assigned in a 4:1 fashion to receive a single dose of monovalent vaccine or placebo by intranasal spray. This study was conducted at multiple sites in the United States. Randomization was stratified by site. Each participant received one dose of investigational product on Day 1. The duration of study participation for each participant was the time from receipt of investigational product through 180 days after receipt of investigational product.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
300
Monovalent vaccine was supplied in intranasal sprayers containing a total volume of 0.5 mL of sucrose-phosphate buffer, egg allantoic fluid, and approximately 10\^7 FFU (fluorescent focus units) of the cold-adapted, attenuated, 6:2 reassortant influenza strain B/Brisbane/60/2008 (Victoria lineage).
Placebo was supplied in intranasal sprayers containing 0.5 mL of sucrose-phosphate buffer.
Covance CRU, Inc.
Daytona Beach, Florida, United States
Covance CRU, Inc
Portland, Oregon, United States
Covance CRU, Inc
Austin, Texas, United States
Number of Participants Reporting Fever, Defined as Oral Temperature ≥ 101°F
The percentage of subjects with fever was compared between the two treatment groups based on the upper limit of the two-sided 95% exact confidence interval (CI) for the rate difference (monovalent vaccine minus placebo). The upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI was evaluated against the pre-specified equivalence criterion of 5 percentage points which corresponded to the following hypotheses: - H0 (null): rate difference ≥ 5 percentage points, - HA (alternative): rate difference \< 5 percentage points.
Time frame: Days 1-8 after vaccination
Number of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom or at Least One Adverse Event (AE)
Solicited symptoms were collected from administration of investigational product through Study Day 15. For this study, solicited symptoms included: fever (\> 100°F oral), runny nose, sore throat, cough, vomiting, muscle aches, chills, decreased activity (tiredness), headache.
Time frame: Days 1-8 after vaccination
Number of Participants Reporting Any Solicited Symptom or at Least One AE
Time frame: Days 1-15 after vaccination
Number of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD)
SAEs were those that resulted in death; were life-threatening; resulted in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; were a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study participant; or were an important medical event that may have jeopardized the subject and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An NOCD was a newly diagnosed medical condition of a chronic, ongoing nature and assessed by the investigator as medically significant.
Time frame: Days 1-29 after vaccination
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Number of Participants Reporting at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD)
SAEs were those that resulted in death; were life-threatening; resulted in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; were a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study participant; or were an important medical event that may have jeopardized the subject and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An NOCD was a newly diagnosed medical condition of a chronic, ongoing nature and assessed by the investigator as medically significant.
Time frame: Days 1-181 after vaccination