This study will assess the influence of the High Cut-Off (HCO) CVVHD treatment on the disease progression in septic patients. The primary aim of the study is to evaluate whether HCO CVVHD leads to a significant improvement of the hemodynamic status (mean arterial pressure, vasopressor requirements) in septic patients in comparison to CVVHD treatment with conventional high-flux filters. For the HCO-group the investigators expect a 50% lower dosage of vasopressors needed to maintain an adequate organ perfusion.
Severe sepsis is a devastating disorder that results from a complex host response to insult after infection. Despite advances in intensive care technologies sepsis remains an important and life-threatening problem. Sepsis is the most common cause of death in the intensive care unit. Local or systemic release of bacteria-derived compounds, leading to the production of proinflammatory cytokines, induce systemic inflammatory reactions in septic patients. Continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) such as hemodialysis (CVVHD), hemofiltration (CVVH) or hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) with conventional high-flux membranes allow to control fluid and electrolyte balance, and to improve the hemodynamic status of the patients. However, conventional high flux membranes have a limited permeability for sepsis-associated mediators with molecular weights in the range of 15.000 to 60.000 Da. A promising approach to enhance the mediator removal is to use membranes having larger pores and permeability characteristics than those currently used in CRRT. For that purpose a High Cut-Off (HCO) membrane has been developed and is manufactured by Gambro Research.After demonstrating the safety as well as the cytokine removal effectiveness in a clinical pilot study this study will assess the influence of the HCO treatment on the disease progression in septic patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
80
dialysate flow rate 35 ml/h/kg. Blood flow rate should be aimed at 200 ml/min, but not less than 150 ml/min. Bicarbonate- or lactate-buffered solutions will be used as dialysis fluids. Study dialyzers will be changed routinely every 24 h or earlier if the filter is obstructed by clotting.
Leopold Franzens Universität Innsbruck
Innsbruck, Austria
Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Nephrologie Charite, Campus Mitte
Berlin, Germany
Charité-Virchow Klinik
Berlin, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
Tübingen, Germany
Dosage of vasopressors
Time frame: day 1 to day 5
Mean arterial pressure
Time frame: day before inclusion and day 1 to day 5
Heart rate
Time frame: day before inclusion and day 1 to day 5
Central venous pressure
Time frame: day before inclusion and day 1 to day 5
Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score
Time frame: at ICU admission, at inclusion and day 1 to day 5
Survival
Time frame: 28 days
Length of need for catecholamine application
Time frame: 28 days follow up
Length of need for mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 28 days
Length of need for renal replacement therapy
Time frame: 28 days
Length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU)
Time frame: 28 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.