A comparison of biweekly combination chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus carboplatin) with weekly gemcitabine in elder patients (\> 75) with previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Primary objective is to determine the objective response rate (CR+PR by RECIST criteria) for biweekly gemcitabine and carboplatin combination chemotherapy versus weekly single gemcitabine as first-line therapy in elder advanced non-small lung cancer patients (\> 76 years) who have received no prior treatment for non-small lung cancer. As secondary objectives, adverse event profile, tolerability of biweekly gemcitabine and carboplatin combination chemotherapy, progression-free survival and overall survival will be evaluated in both patients with biweekly gemcitabine and carboplatin combination chemotherapy and weekly single gemcitabine. The study hypothesis is that biweekly combination chemotherapy of gemcitabine plus carboplatin may improve the efficacy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
60
Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2, DIV on day 1 and 15 of each 28 day cycle. Carboplatin AUC=3, DIV on day 1 and 15 of each 28 day cycle. Number of cycles: until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops, up to 6 cycles.
Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2, DIV on day 1, 8 and 15 of each 28 day cycle. Number of cycles: until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops, up to 6 cycles
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
Efficacy (response rate)
Time frame: two-years, followed RECIST criteria
The toxicity profile (adverse event profile)
Time frame: two-years, followed NCI-CTCAE criteria
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.