The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the HeRO Vascular Access Device in access challenged (e.g., catheter-dependent) hemodialysis patients. It is hypothesized the bacteremia rate associated with the HeRO device will be lower than a historical literature control of tunneled dialysis catheters.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
38
Long-term subcutaneous vascular access device for hemodialysis
University of Miami / Cedars Medical Center
Miami, Florida, United States
St. Joseph's Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Southern Illinois University
Springfield, Illinois, United States
North Memorial Medical Center
Robbinsdale, Minnesota, United States
HeRO superiority in device and implant procedure-related bacteremia compared to historical tunneled dialysis catheter literature control
Time frame: 12 months
Incidence of serious device or implant procedure-related serious adverse events and loss of secondary patency
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Bamberg County Hospital
Bamberg, South Carolina, United States
Baptist Medical Center
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Sentara Heart Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, United States