The Aricept® Evess study is a prospective, non-comparative, non-interventional study on use of Aricept® Evess in the treatment of out-patients with AD and Vascular Dementia. The 24 week length of the study aims to collect data from a large number of patients (n= 400) on the safety and efficacy at the usual dosage of the product providing an overview of Aricept® Evess profile.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
370
5 mg film-coated orodispersible tablets, 10 mg film-coated orodispersible tablets. Treatment may be started with 5 mg donepezil/ day (once-a-day dosing) and after four weeks can be titrated to 10 mg/day (once-a-day dosing).
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bacau, Jud. Bacau, Romania
Pfizer Investigational Site
Cluj-Napoca, Jud. Cluj, Romania
Pfizer Investigational Site
Cluj-Napoca, Jud. Cluj, Romania
Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total at Week 24 Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
MMSE measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, calculation, language, visuospatial functions. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranged from 0 - 30, higher score indicated better cognitive state. Change: mean score at Week 24 LOCF minus mean score at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in MMSE Total
MMSE measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, calculation, language, visuospatial functions. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranged from 0 - 30, higher score indicated better cognitive state. Change: least squares (LS) mean score at observation minus LS mean score at baseline. Changes from baseline at each week were controlled for baseline MMSE.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, 16, and 24
Change From Baseline in Functional Activity Questionnaire (FAQ)
Participants completed the FAQ for physical function. Overall scores could have ranged from 0 (independent) to 30 (dependent) where lower scores represented an improvement in physical function. Change from baseline was to be calculated as baseline scores minus week 24 scores.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 8
CGI-I: 7-point Investigator-rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
Time frame: Week 8
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 16
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Pfizer Investigational Site
Constanța, Jud. Constanta, Romania
Pfizer Investigational Site
Craiova, Jud. Dolj, Romania
Pfizer Investigational Site
Iași, Jud. Iasi, Romania
Pfizer Investigational Site
Ploieşti, Jud. Prahova, Romania
Pfizer Investigational Site
Timișoara, Jud. Timis, Romania
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bucharest, Romania
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bucharest, Romania
...and 2 more locations
CGI-I: 7-point Investigator-rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
Time frame: Week 16
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 24
CGI-I: 7-point Investigator-rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 24 LOCF
CGI-I: 7-point Investigator-rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants in Each Patient Domain of Benefit
Participants asked to indicate if the cognition, functionality, and/or behavior domain were most benefited/improved after treatment (dichotomous yes/no endpoints where checking the CRF box next to each domain indicated 'yes' and leaving a box blank indicated 'no').
Time frame: Week 24