New Tool of Subjective and Objective Functional Evaluation and the Quality of Life After Arthroplastic Surgery of the Hip and the Knee Assisted or Not by Computer and Mini-invasive Arthroplasty

Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille1 enrolled

Overview

Hip or knee arthroplasties allow a relief of pain and a good functional habilitative at patients suffering from degenerative osteoarthritis of these articulations with medium and long-term good results. The main objective of this study is to compare the efficiency in short and medium-term functional impact parlance of two surgical techniques: computer-assisted surgery and mini-invasive surgery compared to the conventional techniques thanks to an innovative technology of ambulatory analysis of walking.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Hip Arthritis Knee Arthritis

Interventions

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 20 YearsMax age: 80 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Weight \< 100 kg * score UCLA \> 4 * prosthesis of first intention Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnant * score UCLA \< 4 * osteotomy near to prosthesis * prosthesis requiring an osseous transplant * prosthesis already set up * infections, contagious diseases (HIV, tuberculosis, hepatitis, venereal diseases) or metastasis * neuromuscular diseases able to perturb walking or staying * congenital or acquired disease, or previous surgery able to have consequences on results and prosthesis survey according to the surgeon

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

To compare the efficiency in short and medium-term functional impact parlance of two surgical techniques: computer-assisted surgery and mini-invasive surgery compared to the conventional techniques

Time frame: 2 years after surgery

Secondary Outcomes

Ambulatory analysis of the walking and coordination of lower limbs, direct and indirect costs