Testing the hypothesis that non-invasive brain stimulation by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with functional training in the subacute phase of first-ever stroke will enhance functional regeneration compared with a Placebo intervention.
Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability, which significantly impairs the economic and social life of patients and society. Every year 200 000 to 250 000 patients suffer a stroke in Germany. Only a small number of the stroke survivors recover to a degree that allows them to return into their professional and private life. Despite significant efforts to develop novel and efficient treatment strategies the level of functional regeneration is still not satisfying. Thus, the development of innovative and effective treatment strategies will have a major impact for the patients' life, the society and the public health system. Within the proposed project an innovative, non-invasive and cost effective interventional strategy, based on the combination of a specific rehabilitative training and brain stimulation by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), will be used to enhance functional regeneration in stroke patients. The intervention will be applied in an early stage in which plasticity, cortical reorganization and functional improvement is most pronounced. We hypothesize that the combination of anodal tDCS delivered to the motor cortex of the affected hemisphere combined with training over a period of two weeks in the subacute stage after stroke will significantly enhance cortical plasticity, functional regeneration and long-term outcome determined by clinical and functional outcome measures compared with Placebo stimulation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
119
Anodal tDCS (20 minutes) stimulation will be applied once a day in combination with standardized upper extremity rehabilitative training
Sham stimulation will be applied once a day in combination with standardized upper extremity rehabilitative training
Neurologische Universitätsklinik Wien
Vienna, State of Vienna, Austria
Klinik Kipfenberg
Kipfenberg, Bavaria, Germany
Brandenburgklinik Berlin-Brandenburg
Bernau Bei Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany
Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer-Assessment (UEFMA)
standardized test of upper extremity function
Time frame: 1-7 days after the end of the intervention
Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer-Assessment (UEFMA)
standardized test of upper extremity function
Time frame: 30±10 days after the intervention
Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer-Assessment (UEFMA)
standardized test of upper extremity function
Time frame: 90±20 days after the intervention
Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer-Assessment (UEFMA) | Long-term outcome
standardized test of upper extremity function
Time frame: 12±1 months after the intervention
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
standardized tests of upper extremity function
Time frame: 1-7 days after the end of the intervention
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
standardized tests of upper extremity function
Time frame: 30±10 days after the intervention
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
standardized tests of upper extremity function
Time frame: 90±20 days after the intervention
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) | Long-term outcome
standardized tests of upper extremity function
Time frame: 12±1 months after the intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Neurologie Moritzklinik
Bad Klosterlausnitz, Thuringia, Germany
Neurologische Klinik Bad Aibling
Bad Aibling, Germany
Neurologisches Zentrum Segeberger Kliniken
Bad Segeberg, Germany
NRZ Leipzig
Bennewitz, Germany
MEDIAN Klinik Berlin-Kladow
Berlin, Germany
University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf (UKE)
Hamburg, Germany
University Medical Center Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Germany
...and 1 more locations
Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT)
standardized test to assess fine motor skills
Time frame: 1-7 days after the end of the intervention
Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT)
standardized test to assess fine motor skills
Time frame: 30±10 days after the intervention
Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT)
standardized test to assess fine motor skills
Time frame: 90±20 days after the intervention
Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT) | Long-term outcome
standardized test to assess fine motor skills
Time frame: 12±1 months after the intervention
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
questionnaire is to evaluate how stroke has impacted health and life of patients
Time frame: 1-7 days after the end of the intervention
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
questionnaire is to evaluate how stroke has impacted health and life of patients
Time frame: 30±10 days after the intervention
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
questionnaire is to evaluate how stroke has impacted health and life of patients
Time frame: 90±20 days after the intervention
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) | Long-term outcome
questionnaire is to evaluate how stroke has impacted health and life of patients
Time frame: 12±1 months after the intervention
Box-and-Block Test
standardized test to assess fine motor skills
Time frame: 1-7 days after the end of the intervention
Box-and-Block Test
standardized test to assess fine motor skills
Time frame: 30±10 days after the intervention
Box-and-Block Test
standardized test to assess fine motor skills
Time frame: 90±20 days after the intervention
Box-and-Block Test
standardized test to assess fine motor skills
Time frame: 12±1 months after the intervention
Grip Force
dynamometer-based test to assess grip strength
Time frame: 1-7 days after the end of the intervention
Grip Force
dynamometer-based test to assess grip strength
Time frame: 30±10 days after the intervention
Grip Force
dynamometer-based test to assess grip strength
Time frame: 90±20 days after the intervention
Grip Force
dynamometer-based test to assess grip strength
Time frame: 12±1 months after the intervention