The purpose of this study is to determine whether adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is better at treating complex sleep apnea over time.
Between 3 and 19% of patients with clinical and polysomnographic features of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) develop a high-frequency of central apneas and/or disruptive Cheyne-Stokes respiratory syndrome after application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), a pattern called the complex sleep apnea syndrome (CompSAS). The trial seeks to determine the efficacy of the ASV vs. CPAP modes for the treatment of CompSAS over time. Baseline clinical and laboratory data will be collected, patients will be randomized to one of the two treatments. Overall study participation is approximately 3 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
66
Comparison of ASV and CPAP modes
REM Medical
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
NorthShore University Health System
Skokie, Illinois, United States
Mayo Center for Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Apnea-hypopnea Index (AHI) Per Polysomnography (PSG) at the End of Treatment Period
AHI refers to the number of apneas and hypopneas that occurred per hour of sleep
Time frame: 3 months
Quality of Life Measured by the Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index (SAQLI)
Likert scale measured from 0-7. The minimum important difference a change of 0.5 when a 7-item Likert scale is used. 0 represents the most negative response, 7 represents the most positive response.
Time frame: 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Center for Sleep Medicine
Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania, United States
SleepMed of South Carolina
Columbia, South Carolina, United States