The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the treatment of true bifurcation lesions with the XIENCE V stent using the simple strategy (stent in main vessel and provisional T-stenting in the side branch) compared to the complex strategy (stent in main vessel and T-stenting in the side branch).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
332
Complex PCI strategy for bifurcation: After optional pre-dilation of one or both vessels (main and side branch), and subsequent implanting of the stent in the main vessel, the side branch is approached by implanting a new stent as T technique. Simple PCI strategy for bifurcation: After optional pre-dilation of one or both vessels (main and side branch), a stent is deployed at main vessel. Side branch is approached by using provisional T stenting technique.
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
Seville, Sevilla, Spain
RECRUITINGUniversity Hospital Virgen Macarena
Seville, Seville, Spain
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGComparison of the rate of binary angiographic restenosis (in main vessel and side branch) in the simple versus complex strategy groups
Time frame: 9 months
Combined rate of events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction and TLR)
Time frame: 8 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.