The purpose of this study is to verify the oncological efficacy and safety of cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of small renal tumors.
By enrolling all patients treated with CA or RFA, this study will document for the first time the safety and the short and long term efficacy of CA compared to RFA as well as provide urologists and decision makers currently unavailable information on CA in Canada.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Cryoneedles and one temperature probe are inserted under endoscopic and sonographic guidance.
Thermal injury is the predominant mechanism of action of RFA. A high-frequency alternating current emitted from the exposed noninsulated portion of the electrode generates frictional heat, agitating ions in the tissue surrounding the tip of the needle.
McMaster Institute of Urology - St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Treatment failure rate.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36, 48
Renal function - GFR of less than 60 ml per min per 1.73 m2. Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48
Average percentage decrease in tumor size.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48
Intra and post-operative complications rates.
Time frame: Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48
Quality of life data.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.