The purpose of this study is to test whether the correction of insulin resistance with pioglitazone, will improve the response to antiviral treatment.
In patients infected with genotypes 1, 4, 5 and 6, the response rate to antiviral therapy remains suboptimal (less than one in two patients have a sustained virological response), which justifies the search for strategies optimizing the results of antiviral therapy. Some factors associated with non response have been identified. Among the modifiable factors, numerous series have shown that insulin resistance adversely impacts the rate of sustained virological response. The aim of this study is to determine whether the pharmacological correction of insulin resistance through therapy with glitazones restores higher rates of viral eradication and to determine the impact on the kinetics of viral response. Patients will be randomized to receive pioglitazone or placebo starting 4 months before initiating pegylated interferon and ribavirin and continued throughout the whole antiviral treatment period.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
40
Pioglitazone, 45 mg QD (30 mg QD the first month)
Placebo 45 mg QD (30 mg QD the first month)
Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Service d'hépatogastroentérologie
Paris, France
Decrease in the HOMA score below 2 after 4 months of treatment with pioglitazone or placebo(at W16). The efficiency is defined as a higher proportion of subjects with HOMA <2 in the pioglitazone group than in the group treated with placebo pioglitazone.
Time frame: W16
Kinetics of decrease in viral response to pegylated interferon. Early virological response rates. Rates of sustained virological response. Effect on steatosis
Time frame: EVR at W16 and W28 SVR at W88
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.