The main goal of this study is to understand the long-term effects of kidney donation on blood pressure, kidney function, and patient-reported health-related quality of life. Living kidney donors and non-donor controls will be studied before and after the living donor transplant. The donors and non-donors will be followed for a minimum of 5 years and a maximum of 15 years. Both groups will be made up of healthy normotensive adults. The purpose of this study is to see if there are any long-term differences between the two groups regarding: 1. risk of hypertension 2. rate of kidney decline 3. risk of albuminuria 4. changes in health-related quality of life The study also looks to assess other outcomes, including: 1. understand and quantify the expenses incurred by donors 2. understand donor factors which influence recipient outcomes The pilot version of this study (The Long Term Medical and Psychological Implications of Becoming a Living Kidney Donor: A Prospective Pilot Study) began in 2004. Donors and controls in the pilot study were given the opportunity to continue on in the main study once it started in 2009.
Transplantation is the preferred treatment option for patients with kidney failure. Compared to dialysis, patients who receive a transplant have a substantial reduction in the risk of death, an improved quality of life, and decreased health care costs. The demand for kidneys has resulted in long waiting lists for deceased donor kidneys. Therefore, living kidney donations have been on the increase over the years in order to meet this demand for kidneys. Living donation also has the added benefit of a shorter waiting time, increased graft success and increased recipient survival compared to deceased donor transplantation. Aside from the advantages for the recipient, living transplantation is a complex medical practice which we must conduct in a safe and ethical manner. The premise for accepting living donors is that the "minimal" risk of short and long-term medical harm realized by the donor is outweighed by the definite advantages to the recipient and potential psychosocial benefits of altruism to the donor. The short-term potential medical consequences for living kidney donors have been well established. Yet, the long-term implications of living kidney donation are far less certain. Potential medical risks include hypertension, reduced kidney function, albuminuria, premature cardiovascular disease, and death. Estimates of these outcomes vary substantially in the literature. As well, the potential long-term medical risks are also communicated inconsistently across transplant communities. It is accepted that most living donors experience increased self-esteem, feelings of well-being and an improved quality of life after their altruistic act. However, some donors have negative psychosocial outcomes which require further clarification. There is also a financial burden to the donor from the donation process. Concerns about future life, disability, and medical insurance have been raised. These issues will be addressed through this research study on the long term implications of donation. A better understanding of post-donation risk and the timing of new disease onset is critical for donor selection, informed consent, and follow-up. The study will assess the attributable risk of living kidney donation using study techniques that meet modern criteria for high methodological quality. Non-donors will have similar indicators of baseline health as donors and will complete the same schedule of follow-up assessments. Data was collected as follows: 1. Pre-donation/baseline (informed consent was obtained, eligibility was assessed, surveys were completed, a basic physical exam was completed, blood and urine samples were collected and training on the home blood pressure machine was completed). This occurred for both donors and non-donor controls either on site or long distance. 2. Three months post-donation (mailed 3 month surveys) 3. Annual post-donation follow-up visits (mailed surveys and blood pressure machine, lab testing completed). The number of annual follow-up visits varied depending on the year of nephrectomy, or simulated nephrectomy year for controls (between 5 years to 15 years) Living kidney donation is practiced with the expectation that minimal risks of donor harm are outweighed by psychological benefits of altruism to the donor and improved recipient health. Our multicentre prospective cohort study of living kidney donors will inform the practice and safety of living kidney donation, including transplant center medical policies on donor selection, patient counseling, informed consent, and long-term patient follow-up and care.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
1,438
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
Perth, Australia
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Health Sciences Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Queen Elizabeth II Hospital
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
St. Joseph's Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
...and 3 more locations
Hypertension
Incident hypertension will be adjudicated by a physician who is blinded to the participant's donation status. Adjudication will occur if a participant meets the following criteria in follow-up: (1) the participant reports a physician diagnosis of hypertension, (2) the participant reports taking medication for hypertension, or (3) the participant has a systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 or a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mmHg based on the average blood pressure (BP) measurements at any follow-up visit. Stage 1 hypertension will be defined as SBP/DBP 130 to 139/80 to 89 mmHg. We will also assess the average change in SBP and DBP over time accounting for the use of antihypertensive medications. Donors with pre-donation hypertension will be excluded from this primary analysis.
Time frame: Annually (one data collection per year) for a minimum of 5 years to a maximum of 15 years after donation (baseline)
Kidney Function
We will assess the annualized change in eGFR over time (in mL/min per 1.73 m2 per year) in donors and non-donors using all available eGFR measurements, setting the starting eGFR value to be the one obtained (1) 1 year after the nephrectomy date (or 1 year after the assigned nephrectomy date for non-donors), (2) 3 years after the nephrectomy date, and (3) at baseline (pre-donation). We will also examine the proportion of participants whose eGFR fell below 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 in follow-up, the proportion whose eGFR fell below 45 mL/min per 1.73 m2, and the proportion whose eGFR fell below 30 mL/min per 1.73 m2.
Time frame: Annually (one data collection per year) for a minimum of 5 years to a maximum of 15 years after donation (baseline)
Albuminuria
We will compare the geometric mean albumin-to-creatinine ratio in donors versus non-donors at the final follow-up visit, adjusted for the baseline (pre-donation) value. Values that are too low to measure will be recoded as 0.2 mg/mmol. We will also examine the proportion of participants who have an albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥3 mg/mmol (≥30 mg/g) or \>30 mg/mmol (\>300 mg/g) at any time in follow-up.
Time frame: Annually (one data collection per year) for a minimum of 5 years to a maximum of 15 years after donation (baseline)
Hypertension, an eGFR<60, and/or albuminuria
We will examine the proportion of participants who develop hypertension, an eGFR \<60 mL/min per 1.73 m2, or an albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥3 mg/mmol. This outcome will be assessed as a composite, with death (expected to be rare during the follow-up period) treated as a competing event. We will also report the proportions of participants who develop (1) 2 or 3 of these components and (2) all 3 of these components.
Time frame: Annually (one data collection per year) for a minimum of 5 years to a maximum of 15 years after donation (baseline)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.