RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays and other types of radiation to kill tumor cells. It is not yet known whether a single dose of radiation therapy is more effective than implant radiation therapy for 5 days in treating patients with recurrent breast cancer. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying implant radiation therapy to see how well it works compared with radiation therapy during surgery in treating patients with recurrent breast cancer.
OBJECTIVES: * To determine the in breast recurrence rate following repeat radiation to the breast. These patients will be followed for a period of five years following completion of radiation to determine these rates. * To determine the cosmetic outcome resulting from partial breast re-irradiation using different techniques, including both physician and patient rated scales. * To determine patient satisfaction of partial breast re-irradiation as it pertains to their overall treatment experience, as measured by a questionnaire. * To determine if there are patient factors illuminated during a discussion of informed consent, which limit a patient's suitability to receive partial breast re-irradiation delivered by a particular technique. * To evaluate tylectomy wound healing and overall complication rate after partial breast re-irradiation. * To determine ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence rates and tumor bed recurrence rates.These patients will be followed for a period of five years following completion of the second course of radiation to determine these rates. OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to which modality is best suited for the patient. Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 groups. All patients undergo excisional biopsy or needle localization removal of the tumor. Patients with margins \< 2 mm undergo re-excision of the biopsy cavity. * Group 1: Patients undergo partial breast irradiation delivered as a single intra-operative radiation dose to the tumor bed. * Group 2: Patients undergo partial breast irradiation delivered by Mammosite® brachytherapy consisting of 10 fractions over 5 days. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, 1 month after completion of radiotherapy, and then at follow-up visits. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 month, every 3 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months for 5 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
13
Patients undergo brachytherapy
Patients undergo radiotherapy
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
UHHS Chagrin Highlands Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
UHHS Westlake Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates
Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.
Time frame: 1 month after radiation therapy (RT)
Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates
Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.
Time frame: 3 months after RT
Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates
Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.
Time frame: 6 months after RT
Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates
Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.
Time frame: 9 months after RT
Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates
Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.
Time frame: 12 months after RT
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates
Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.
Time frame: 2 years after RT
Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates
Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.
Time frame: 3 years after RT
Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates
Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.
Time frame: 4 years after RT
Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates
Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.
Time frame: 5 years after RT
Tumor Bed Recurrence Rates
Percent of participants with tumor bed recurrence, defined as recurrence in the same quadrant as the surgical excision
Time frame: 1 month after RT
Tumor Bed Recurrence Rates
Percent of participants with tumor bed recurrence, defined as recurrence in the same quadrant as the surgical excision
Time frame: 3 month after RT
Tumor Bed Recurrence Rates
Percent of participants with tumor bed recurrence, defined as recurrence in the same quadrant as the surgical excision
Time frame: 6 month after RT
Tumor Bed Recurrence Rates
Percent of participants with tumor bed recurrence, defined as recurrence in the same quadrant as the surgical excision
Time frame: 12 month after RT
Tumor Bed Recurrence Rates
Percent of participants with tumor bed recurrence, defined as recurrence in the same quadrant as the surgical excision
Time frame: 2 years after RT
Tumor Bed Recurrence Rates
Percent of participants with tumor bed recurrence, defined as recurrence in the same quadrant as the surgical excision
Time frame: 3 years after RT
Tumor Bed Recurrence Rates
Percent of participants with tumor bed recurrence, defined as recurrence in the same quadrant as the surgical excision
Time frame: 4 years after RT
Tumor Bed Recurrence Rates
Percent of participants with tumor bed recurrence, defined as recurrence in the same quadrant as the surgical excision
Time frame: 5 years after RT
Cosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established Scale
Cosmetic outcome as determined by four-level scale of cosmetic outcome scale, with levels poor, fair, good, and excellent in increasingly positive outcomes. Excellent: Minimal or no difference in the size or shape of the treated breast Good: Slight difference in the size or shape of the treated breast Fair: Obvious difference in the shape and size of the treated breast Poor: Obvious difference in the shape and size of the treated breast
Time frame: 1 month after RT & Q3mos for one year and at 5 years
Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey
Percent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering "my satisfaction about the treatment and results is" 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.
Time frame: 1 month after RT
Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey
Percent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering "my satisfaction about the treatment and results is" 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.
Time frame: 3 month after RT
Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey
Percent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering "my satisfaction about the treatment and results is" 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.
Time frame: 6 month after RT
Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey
Percent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering "my satisfaction about the treatment and results is" 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.
Time frame: 9 month after RT
Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey
Percent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering "my satisfaction about the treatment and results is" 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.
Time frame: 12 month after RT
Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey
Percent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering "my satisfaction about the treatment and results is" 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.
Time frame: 2 years after RT
Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey
Percent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering "my satisfaction about the treatment and results is" 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.
Time frame: 3 years after RT
Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey
Percent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering "my satisfaction about the treatment and results is" 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.
Time frame: 4 years after RT
Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey
Percent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering "my satisfaction about the treatment and results is" 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.
Time frame: 5 years after RT
Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention
Overall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention
Time frame: 1 month after RT
Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention
Overall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention
Time frame: 3 month after RT
Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention
Overall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention
Time frame: 6 month after RT
Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention
Overall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention
Time frame: 9 month after RT
Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention
Overall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention
Time frame: 12 month after RT
Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention
Overall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention
Time frame: 2 years after RT
Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention
Overall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention
Time frame: 3 years after RT
Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention
Overall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention
Time frame: 4 years after RT
Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention
Overall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention
Time frame: 5 years after RT
Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing
Wound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing
Time frame: 1 month after RT
Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing
Wound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing
Time frame: 3 month after RT
Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing
Wound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing
Time frame: 6 month after RT
Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing
Wound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing
Time frame: 9 month after RT
Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing
Wound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing
Time frame: 12 month after RT
Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing
Wound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing
Time frame: 2 years after RT
Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing
Wound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing
Time frame: 3 years after RT
Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing
Wound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing
Time frame: 4 years after RT
Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing
Wound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing
Time frame: 5 years after RT