The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and descriptive immunogenicity of the H1N1 influenza vaccine in healthy children.
The primary objective of this study was to assess the safety and descriptive immunogenicity of a monovalent influenza virus vaccine containing a new 6:2 influenza virus reassortant in healthy children.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
326
0.5 mL: (intranasal sprayer)
Placebo was supplied in intranasal sprayers containing 0.5 mL of sucrose-phosphate buffer
Coastal Clinic Research, Inc.
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Benchmark Research
Sacramento, California, United States
Number of Participants With Fever Post Dose 1 (Days 1-8), Defined as an Axillary Temperature ≥ 101°F (38.3°C).
The number of participants with fever between the two treatment groups was compared based on the upper limit of the two-sided 95% exact confidence intervals for the rate difference (Vaccine minus Placebo). The upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence intervals was evaluated against the prespecified equivalence criterion of 10% which corresponded to the following hypotheses: H0 (null): rate difference ≥ 10%, HA (alternative): rate difference \< 10%.
Time frame: Days 1- 8
Number of Participants Who Experience a Post Dose 1 (Day 15) Seroresponse Against the H1N1 Strain in All Participants Regardless of Baseline Serostatus
Seroresponse is described as greater than or equal to a 4-fold rise in hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titer from baseline. All immunogenicity analyses was based on the immunogenicity population.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 15
Number of Participants Who Experience a Post Dose 1 (Day 29) Seroresponse Against the H1N1 Strain in All Participants Regardless of Baseline Serostatus
Seroresponse is described as greater than or equal to a 4-fold rise in HAI titer from baseline. All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 29
Number of Participants Who Experience a Post Dose 2 (Day 57) Seroresponse Against the H1N1 Strain in All Participants Regardless of Baseline Serostatus
Seroresponse is described as greater than or equal to a 4-fold rise in HAI titer from baseline. All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 57
Number of Participants With Any Solicited Symptoms Within 7 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 1
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
California Research Foundation
San Diego, California, United States
Benchmark Research
San Francisco, California, United States
Kentucky Pediatric Research Center
Bardstown, Kentucky, United States
Central Kentucky Research Associates, Inc.
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Sundance Clinical Research
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Meridian Clinical Research
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Clinical Research Center of Nevada
Henderson, Nevada, United States
Rochester Clinical Research Inc.
Rochester, New York, United States
...and 6 more locations
Other solicited symptoms include fever (\> 100°F \[37.8°C\] axillary), runny/stuffy nose, sore throat, cough, headache, generalized muscle aches, decreased activity level (lethargy) or tiredness/weakness, decreased appetite.
Time frame: Days 1-8
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs) Within 7 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 1
Time frame: Days 1-8
Number of Participants Using Anti-pyretic and Analgesic Agents Within 7 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 1
Time frame: Days 1-8
Number of Participants With Any Solicited Symptoms Within 14 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 1
Time frame: Days 1-15
Number of Participants Reporting AEs Within 14 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 1
Time frame: Days 1-15
Number of Participants Using Anti-pyretic and Analgesic Agents Within 14 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 1
Time frame: Days 1-15
Number of Participants With Any Solicited Symptoms Within 7 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 2
Time frame: Days 29-36
Number of Participants Reporting AEs Within 7 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 2
Time frame: Days 29-36
Number of Participants Using Anti-pyretic and Analgesic Agents Within 7 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 2
Time frame: Days 29-36
Number of Participants With Any Solicited Symptoms Within 14 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 2
Time frame: Days 29-43
Number of Participants Reporting AEs Within 14 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 2
Time frame: Days 29-43
Number of Participants Using Anti-pyretic and Analgesic Agents Within 14 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 2
Time frame: Days 29-43
Number of Participants With New Onset Chronic Diseases (NOCDs) Within 28 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 1.
An NOCD was a newly diagnosed medical condition that was of a chronic, ongoing nature and was assessed by the investigator as medically significant. Examples of NOCDs included, but were not limited to, diabetes, asthma, autoimmune disease (eg, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis), and neurological disease (eg, epilepsy, autism). Examples of events not considered NOCDs were mild eczema, diagnosis of a congenital anomaly present at study entry, or acute illness (eg, otitis media, bronchitis).
Time frame: Days 1-29
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Within 28 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 1
SAEs were those AEs that resulted in death; were immediately life threatening; resulted in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; were a congenital anomaly in the offspring of a participant; or were an important medical event that may not have resulted in death, threatened life, or required hospitalization and that, based on appropriate medical judgment, may have jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time frame: Days 1-29
Number of Participants With NOCDs Within 28 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 2.
An NOCD was a newly diagnosed medical condition that was of a chronic, ongoing nature and was assessed by the investigator as medically significant. Examples of NOCDs included, but were not limited to, diabetes, asthma, autoimmune disease (eg, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis), and neurological disease (eg, epilepsy, autism). Examples of events not considered NOCDs were mild eczema, diagnosis of a congenital anomaly present at study entry, or acute illness (eg, otitis media, bronchitis).
Time frame: Days 29-57
Number of Participants With SAEs Within 28 Days After Vaccination With Investigational Product, Dose 2
SAEs were those AEs that resulted in death; were immediately life threatening; resulted in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; were a congenital anomaly in the offspring of a participant; or were an important medical event that may not have resulted in death, threatened life, or required hospitalization and that, based on appropriate medical judgment, may have jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time frame: Days 29-57
Number of Participants With NOCDs Within 180 Days Post Final Dose of Investigational Product.
An NOCD was a newly diagnosed medical condition that was of a chronic, ongoing nature and was assessed by the investigator as medically significant. Examples of NOCDs included, but were not limited to, diabetes, asthma, autoimmune disease (eg, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis), and neurological disease (eg, epilepsy, autism). Examples of events not considered NOCDs were mild eczema, diagnosis of a congenital anomaly present at study entry, or acute illness (eg, otitis media, bronchitis).
Time frame: Days 1-209
Number of Participants With SAEs Within 180 Days Post Final Dose of Investigational Product.
SAEs were those AEs that resulted in death; were immediately life threatening; resulted in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; were a congenital anomaly in the offspring of a participant; or were an important medical event that may not have resulted in death, threatened life, or required hospitalization and that, based on appropriate medical judgment, may have jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time frame: Days 1-209
Number of Participants Who Achieve a Post Dose 1 (Day 15) HAI Titer Greater Than or Equal to 32 Against the H1N1 Strain in All Participants, Regardless of Baseline Serostatus.
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 15
Number of Participants Who Achieve a Post Dose 1 (Day 29) HAI Titer Greater Than or Equal to 32 Against the H1N1 Strain in All Participants, Regardless of Baseline Serostatus.
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 29
Number of Participants Who Achieve a Post Dose 2 (Day 57) HAI Titer Greater Than or Equal to 32 Against the H1N1 Strain in All Participants, Regardless of Baseline Serostatus.
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 57
Serum HAI Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) in All Participants, Regardless of Baseline Serostatus, Dose 1 (Day 15)
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 15
Serum HAI GMTs in All Participants, Regardless of Baseline Serostatus, Dose 1 (Day 29)
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 29
Serum HAI GMTs in All Participants, Regardless of Baseline Serostatus, Dose 2 (Day 57)
All immunogenicity analyses are based on the immunogenicity population.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 57