The primary objectives of the study is to compare gait kinematics and the return to normalization of gait in patients that have undergone a Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach versus the posterior approach. Gait kinematics will be measured using the IDEEA LifeGait device from Minisun (Fresno, CA).
This is a prospective study of two different surgical approaches to THA, direct anterior vs posterior approach in approximately 64 patients that meet the standard criteria for the implantation of primary total hip replacement utilizing the Medacta implants and have elected to undergo THA.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
64
Anterior Minimal Invasive Surgery (AMIS)
Sun Valley Orthopedic Surgeons
Surprise, Arizona, United States
D. Kevin Lester, MD
Fresno, California, United States
Peak Orthopedics
Lone Tree, Colorado, United States
Intermountain Healthcare
St. George, Utah, United States
Compare gait kinematics and the return to normalization of gait in patients that have undergone a THA via the direct anterior approach vs. the posterior approach.
Time frame: Pre-Op, (2 weeks if fully ambulatory), 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year
Evaluate/compare two surgical approaches (direct anterior vs. posterior): Patient improvement (subjective and objective) following THA using the HHS. Patient overall function and pain following THA using the WOMAC. Post operative radiological findings
Time frame: Pre-Op, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.