Currently the two-stage tissue expander/implant (TE/I) technique is the standard breast reconstructive option for breast cancer patients selected for immediate, skin-sparing mastectomy. This procedure has been demonstrated to be oncologically safe in patients with specific criteria for early stage breast cancer. The primary drawback, however, is that it requires two separate procedures under general anesthesia and multiple office visits for expander inflation to create the breast mound. Acellular dermal matrix has gained widespread acceptance for use in breast reconstruction and other areas and has the potential to provide support to the breast implant without tissue expansion in a one-stage procedure. The purpose of the study is to test this new procedure and to evaluate the impact of one-stage breast reconstruction using acellular dermis compared to the standard two-stage expander/implant technique on measures of patient satisfaction and quality of life.
Recently, there has been significant focus on the performance of skin-sparing mastectomies in certain types of breast cancer patients. These treatments may be performed for prophylactic mastectomy but also have been demonstrated to be oncologically safe in patients with specific criteria for early stage breast cancer. Currently, the two-stage tissue expander/implant (TE/I) technique is the standard breast reconstructive option for breast cancer patients selected for immediate, skin-sparing mastectomy, however there are significant disadvantages as this technique requires two separate surgeries and multiple office visits to complete that may affect a patients quality of life. Medically safe compounds such as acellular dermal matrix have been developed that have the potential to support breast implants without requiring numerous tissue expansions and consequently providing the potential for a one-stage breast implant/reconstruction procedure for immediate, skin-sparing mastectomies. To examine patient satisfaction, quality of life and overall aesthetic outcome achieved using the acellular dermal matrix facilitated one-staged breast reconstruction at 2 weeks, 6 \& 12 months following completion of the reconstruction. Hypothesis 2: Patient satisfaction, quality of life and overall aesthetic outcome achieved using the acellular dermal matrix facilitated one-stage breast reconstruction is superior to that following the standard two-stage tissue expander/ implant breast reconstruction technique in selected mastectomy patients. To determine the short and long-term operative complication rates associated with the use of dermal matrix in one-stage immediate breast reconstruction following skin-sparing mastectomy. Hypothesis 1: The use of acellular dermal matrix in one-stage immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction is associated with decreased short and long-term postoperative complications compared with the traditional two staged tissue expander/implant procedure.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
198
One-stage breast reconstruction with dermal matrix and implant
Two-stage breast reconstruction with tissue expander and implant
Tom Baker Cancer Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Plastic Surgery, Women's College Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
BreastQ Quality of Life and Satisfaction Questionnaire
Compare the change in the patient satisfaction and QOL scores between one-stage ADM-assisted and two-stage TE/I reconstruction without ADM over time (at 2 weeks after mastectomy, at 6 months and at 12 months following the final reconstruction procedure) from baseline scores following reconstruction using the validated BREAST-Q reconstruction module. The BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module is used to measure outcomes across four domains/sub-scales: satisfaction with the breast, psychosocial wellbeing, physical wellbeing, and sexual wellbeing. Each domain is scored on a scale of 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life and greater patient satisfaction with more favorable outcomes.
Time frame: 12 months post-op
Number of Participants With Short Term Surgical Complications
Short complication rates were collected prospectively on intraoperative and postoperative assessment forms. Short-term complications were those that occur intraoperatively or within the first 2 months of surgery
Time frame: 6- months post-op
Number of Participants With Long Term Surgical Complications
Long-term minor and major surgical complication rates were documented and collected prospectively on intraoperative and postoperative assessment form at 12-months follow-up visit
Time frame: 12 months post-op
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.