Ropivacaine 0.5% and 0.5% in levobupivacaïne are used in regional anesthesia for major surgery of the foot. The literature does not highlight a significant difference in terms of onset of action between these two molecules to block the sciatic nerve \[4\]. Our hypothesis is that this lack of difference is due to the use of a neurostimulator for locating the injection site (indiscriminate nature of the anatomical approach to the sciatic nerve). Indeed, the sensitivity of neurostimulation is low compared with ultrasound \[58\] and ultrasound, for accurate visualization of the deposit of the local anesthetic around the nerve to improve the quality of the block and reduce the onset of action of local anesthetic \[46, 47\]. The investigators propose to make a comparative trial between levobupivacaïne 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% under the control of the ultrasound as part of a sciatic nerve block. The use of ultrasound will reduce the variability of results because the changes would be linked exclusively to the local anesthetic. The investigators test the hypothesis that levobupivacaïne gives better results in terms of onset of action than ropivacaine.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
35
20mL de levobupivacaïne 0,5 % 20mL de ropivacaïne 0,5 %
20mL de ropivacaïne 0,5 %
Nantes University Hospital
Nantes, France
Compare the Onset of Action of Ropivacaine 0.5% and levobupivacaïne 0.5 % for Sciatic Nerve Block Guided in Major Surgery of the Foot
Time frame: 72 hours
Evaluate the Relative Position of the Tibial and Contigent Fibulaire Common in the Sciatic Nerve.
Time frame: 72 hours
Duration of Motor Sciatic Block (h)
Time frame: 72 hours
Duration of Sensory Sciatic Block (h)
Time frame: 72 hours
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.