The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in stress shielding and bone resorption of the proximal femur in two anatomical stem total hip designs.
Stress shielding related bone resorption in the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty continues to be a problem. The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to evaluate which of the two anatomical stem designs achieved a more physiological load transfer by assessing bone mineral changes in the proximal femur after stem implantation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
120
Total hip femoral component anatomically designed for a proximal fit without a stem
Anatomical proximal fitted cementless stemmed femoral component
Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Bone mineral density of surrounding proximal femur according to Gruen zones
Time frame: At least 2years after surgery
Harris hip score
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.