The objective of this study is to evaluate the use of an absorbable barbed suture as compared to a conventional absorbable suture when used for dermal closure during certain body contouring procedures.
One of the greater common challenges of a surgical procedure is to effectively and efficiently close wounds across various levels of muscle, fat, fascia and/or skin. Surgical sutures continue to be the material of choice for wound closure. However, complications of sutures are those associated with tying knots to secure the suture. Examples of associated suture complications, although not comprehensive, include knot breakage and slippage, suture extrusion or spitting, infection, ischemia and scarring, reduced wound strength and inflammation and dehiscence. Both interrupted and continuous suture patterns require knots for suture line security when conventional suture constructs are used. Barbed sutures are designed to eliminate the need for tying knots during closure, thus ameliorating the detrimental aspects of knots.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
229
Barbed absorbable suture
3-0 Monocryl Absorbable Suture (non-barbed)
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
Total Dermal Closure Time
In calculating the total dermal closure time, only the intradermal closure time is used for those subjects that did not have the deep dermal layer closed.
Time frame: At time of surgery
Cosmesis
Photographs of scars were obtained at 12 week visit and reviewed by a independent blinded plastic surgeon. The blinded assessor scored four elements of scar appearance on a scale of 1 to 5 each, including color match, width, borders and edges, and contour and distortion. On this scale, 1 = worst, 2= poor, 3= average, 4=good and 5=excellent. For the purpose of analysis, all scores for a patient were summed into a single composite score (4-20).
Time frame: 12 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
The Hunstad Center for Cosmetic Plastic Surgery
Huntersville, North Carolina, United States
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
University Hospital Bonn
Frauenklinik, Bonn, Germany
Marien Hospital Stuttgart
Boheimstrasse, Stuttgart, Germany