Diverting ileostomies are created to protect a rectal anastomosis or in situations with a risk of intestinal perforation. Currently, the application of a rod to hinder slippage of the loop is an established technique to perform a diverting loop ileostomy. However, various "rod-less" techniques have been described and are performed with similar success. The aim of this study is to determine, whether a modification (without rod) of the current standard method of protective loop ileostomy formation (with rod) could improve ileostomy specific morbidity. Secondary endpoints include stoma care, determinants of quality of life and stoma function.
Background For rectal anastomoses within 6 cm of the anal verge, leakage rates are up to 15%. Here liberal use of protective stomas is widely accepted. Fecal diversion by loop ostomy may also be performed after extended adhesiolysis with serosal lesions and risk of intestinal perforation, in patients with obstructing rectal tumours requiring neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy or in patients with complex anorectal injuries or fistulas. Generally, diverting loop ileostomies are secured at skin level by means of a supporting device in order to prevent retraction of the loop ileostomy into the abdomen. Nevertheless, due to the supporting rod, difficulties may occur in applying a stoma bag correctly and leakage of feces onto the skin may occur even with correct eversion of the afferent limb. Despite easier application of stoma bags and therefore reduced risk of skin irritation, none of these alternative techniques are established. In various non-randomized studies rodless loop ileostomies were described with an overall morbidity between 3 and 39%. However definition of morbidity varies significantly in these studies and randomised controlled trials are missing so far. Objective The aim of this study is to determine, whether a modification (without rod) of the current standard method of protective loop ileostomy formation (with rod) could improve ileostomy specific morbidity. Secondary endpoints include stoma care, determinants of quality of life and stoma function. Methods The study is designed as multi-institutional, randomized controlled, two-armed study. Patients scheduled for a protective loop ileostomy and meeting the eligibility criteria will be randomized to creation of a loop ileostomy with or without sustaining rod.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
121
Diverting loop ileostomy with rod
diverting loop ileostomy without rod
Bern University Hospital, Dep. of Visceral and Transplant Surgery
Bern, Switzerland
Severe stoma specific morbidity rate
Time frame: postoperative during 2 weeks, 3 months postoperative
Rate of patients reaching self-sufficient stoma care
Time frame: postoperative during 2 weeks
Time used by the stoma nurses for instructing and assisting patients
Measured in total hours from the intervention up to 3 months postoperatively
Time frame: preoperative, 2 weeks and 3 months postoperative
Quality of life (QoL) by a stoma quality of life scale
Time frame: postoperative during 2 weeks, 3 months postoperative
Predictive factors for stomal complications
Time frame: postoperative during 2 weeks, 3 months postoperative
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.