This is a post-market study of the Rebound Hernia Repair Device to further establish the safety, efficacy, and utility of the Rebound Hernia Repair Device in a controlled population. The Rebound Hernia Repair Device will be used for its approved indication in comparison to "standard" hernia mesh. Two-way students t-tests, Chi squared analysis and ANOVA will be used to detect differences in variables. The study is sufficiently powered to detect a 25% difference. The study data will include quality of life assessments, visual analogue scale , SF-36, Carolinas Comfort Scale), recurrence of hernia (technical failure), use of medications (pain) and complications/adverse events.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
70
Laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair using the Rebound HRD and no fixation
Laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair using standard hernia mesh with fixation
University of Kentucky Dept. Of Surgery
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
The Ohio State Medical Center, Dept. of Surgery
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Presence of hernia recurrence
Time frame: 2 years
Pain and discomfort to patients using VAS
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.