This study will assess the onset and maintenance of effect of tocilizumab on relief in patients with active moderate or severe rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to DMARDs or anti-TNF. For the first, double-blind, part of the study patients will be randomized to receive an iv infusion of either 8mg/kg tocilizumab or placebo. After 4 weeks this will be followed by 11 months treatment with tocilizumab 8mg/kg iv infusion every 4 weeks. Methotrexate or DMARD therapy will be continued throughout study treatment. Target sample size is \>100.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
103
single iv infusion 8 mg/kg
single iv infusion
iv infusion 8mg/kg every 4 weeks for 11 months
Unnamed facility
Amiens, France
Unnamed facility
Amiens, France
Unnamed facility
Bayonne, France
Unnamed facility
Bois-Guillaume, France
Unnamed facility
Bordeaux, France
Unnamed facility
Brest, France
Unnamed facility
Cahors, France
Unnamed facility
Chambray-lès-Tours, France
Unnamed facility
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Unnamed facility
Échirolles, France
...and 12 more locations
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 4
HAQ-DI includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0 (equals)=without difficulties; 1= with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3. Relevant clinical improvement was defined as a reduction of at least 0.22 points in HAQ-DI.
Time frame: Week 4
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Participants were asked to rate their assessment of disease activity using a visual analog scale (VAS) of 0 to 100 millimeters (mm), where 0 represented no symptoms and 100 represented severe symptoms. Participants were asked to mark the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Open Treatment Period
Participants were asked to rate their assessment of disease activity using a VAS of 0 to 100 mm, where 0 represented no symptoms and 100 represented severe symptoms. Participants were asked to mark the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Physicians were asked to assess disease activity of the participants using a VAS of 0 to 100 mm, where 0 represented no symptoms and 100 represented severe symptoms. Physicians were asked to mark the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Open Treatment Period
Physicians were asked to assess disease activity of the participants using a VAS of 0 to 100 mm, where 0 represented no symptoms and 100 represented severe symptoms. Physicians were asked to mark the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Patient Global Assessment of Pain During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Participants were asked to rate their assessment of pain using a VAS of 0 to 100 mm, where 0 represented no pain and 100 represented intolerable pain. Participants were asked to mark the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Patient Global Assessment of Pain During the Open Treatment Period
Participants were asked to rate their assessment of pain using a VAS of 0 to 100 mm, where 0 represented no pain and 100 represented intolerable pain. Participants were asked to mark the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Synovitis Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Assessed Using B-Mode Ultrasound
Synovitis was assessed by ultrasonography (B-mode ultrasound and Power Doppler) and scored from "0" to "3", for each of 40 joints (5 metacarpal phalangeal \[MCP; left and right\] joints, 5 proximal interphalangeal \[PIP; left and right\] joints, left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 metatarsal phalangeal \[MTP; left and right\] joints); synovitis scores were calculated by adding the sum of scores for each joint for a total score ranging from 0 to 120. A score of 0 indicated no damage and a score of 120 indicated most severe damage. Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Synovitis Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Assessed Using Power Doppler Ultrasound
Synovitis was assessed by ultrasonography (B-mode ultrasound and Power Doppler) and scored from "0" to "3", for each of 40 joints (5 MCP \[left and right\] joints, 5 PIP \[left and right\] joints, left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP \[left and right\] joints); synovitis scores were calculated by adding the sum of scores for each joint for a total score ranging from 0 to 120 (higher score=more severe disease). Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. Negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Synovitis Score During the Open Treatment Period Assessed Using B-Mode Ultrasound
Synovitis was assessed by ultrasonography (B-mode ultrasound and Power Doppler) and scored from "0" to "3", for each of 40 joints (5 MCP \[left and right\] joints, 5 PIP \[left and right\] joints, left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP \[left and right\] joints); synovitis scores were calculated by adding the sum of scores for each joint for a total score ranging from 0 to 120 (higher score=more severe disease). Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. Relative change was the percentage (%) change from baseline.
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, and 48
Percent Change From Baseline in Synovitis Score During the Open Treatment Period Assessed Using Power Doppler Ultrasound
Synovitis was assessed by ultrasonography (B-mode ultrasound and Power Doppler) and scored from "0" to "3", for each of 40 joints (5 MCP \[left and right\] joints, 5 PIP \[left and right\] joints, left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP \[left and right\] joints); synovitis scores were calculated by adding the sum of scores for each joint for a total score ranging from 0 to 120 (higher score=more severe disease). Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. Relative change was the percentage change from baseline.
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, and 48
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate is a biological marker of inflammation, measured in mm per hour (mm/hr). A reduction in ESR indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Double-Blind Treatment
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate is a biological marker of inflammation. A negative change indicates improvement.
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 4
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Open Treatment Period
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate is a biological marker of inflammation, measured in mm/hr. A reduction in ESR indicates improvement. Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
C-Reactive Protein During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
C-Reactive protein (CRP) is a biological marker of inflammation and is measured in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL). A reduction in CRP indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
C-Reactive protein (CRP) is a biological marker of inflammation. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement.
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 4
C- Reactive Protein During the Open Treatment Period
C-reactive protein is a biological marker of inflammation and is measured in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL). Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Serum Amyloid A Component During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Serum Amyloid A (SAA) component is a biological marker of inflammation and is measured in mg/L. A reduction in SAA indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Amyloid A Component During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Serum Amyloid A (SAA) component is a biological marker of inflammation. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 4
Serum Amyloid A Component During the Open Treatment Period
Serum Amyloid A (SAA) component is a biological marker of inflammation measured in mg/L. Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Beta 2 Microglobulin Levels During the Open Treatment Period
Beta 2 Microglobulin is a biological marker of inflammation measured in micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL). Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Beta 2 Microglobulin Levels During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Beta 2 Microglobulin is a biological marker of inflammation measured in micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL).
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in Beta 2 Microglobulin Levels During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Beta 2 Microglobulin is a biological marker of inflammation. If baseline value was equal to 0, it was replaced by 0.1 to calculate the change from baseline.
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 4
Bone Mineral Density
To describe bone mineral density (BMD), standardized values were calculated for lumbar spine, hip, femoral neck, and trochanter, taking into account the type of Dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA) used. All DXA at baseline were taken into account (done from before screening to Week 8). DXA at end of study were taken into account if they were done after at least 6 infusions of tocilizumab. Values were measured in milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm\^2).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 48
Percentage of Participants Treated With Corticosteroids Over the 1-Year Tocilizumab Period
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48
S-Sclerostin and P-Dkk1 (Wnt Signaling Inhibitor Dickkopf) Over the 1-Year Tocilizumab Period
S-Sclerostin and P-Dkk1 are biological markers of bone and cartilage metabolism measured as picograms/milliliter (pg/mL). Baseline is the closest value plus or minus (+/-) 1 month around the first tocilizumab infusion. If values before and after the first infusion were eligible, the value before was taken into account.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 48
Serum Procollagen Type II N-Propeptide (s-PIINP), Serum Procollagen Type I N Propeptide (s-PINP), and Serum Carboxy-Terminal Collagen Crosslinks-1 (s-CTX-I) Over the 1-Year Tocilizumab Period
S-PIIINP, S-CTX-I, and S-PINP are biological markers of bone and cartilage metabolism. Baseline is the closest value +/- 1 month around the first tocilizumab infusion. If values before and after the first infusion were eligible, the value before was taken into account.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, and 48
Serum Osteogenic Growth Peptide (s-OGP) Over the 1-Year Tocilizumab Period
S-OGP is a biological marker of bone and cartilage metabolism measured as picomoles per liter (pmol/L). Baseline is the closest value +/- 1 month around the first tocilizumab infusion. If values before and after the first infusion were eligible, the value before was taken into account.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12 and 48
Weekly Methotrexate (MTX) Dose
Before entering the study, participants had to be treated with MTX for at least 12 weeks and at a stable dose for at least 8 weeks before the screening visit (10-25 mg per week \[mg/week\] of oral or parenteral MTX). During the study, treatment with MTX had to be stable during the first month and then could be continued or modified, at the investigator's discretion.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 24 and 48
HAQ-DI During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Time frame: Screening and Week 4
HAQ-DI During the Open Treatment Period
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness in Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status. Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4.
Time frame: Day 0, Week 1, and Week 4
Percent Change From Baseline in FACIT-F During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status. Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4.
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 4
FACIT-F During the Open Treatment Period
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status. Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Hemoglobin Concentration During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Hemoglobin concentrations were determined at each visit to evaluate anemia in participants and measured as grams per deciliter (g/dL).
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4
Hemoglobin Concentration During the Open Treatment Period
Hemoglobin concentrations were determined at each visit to evaluate anemia in participants and measured as g/dL.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48
Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 28-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Twenty-eight joints were assessed for tenderness. Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 28. Baseline = value at Day 0 if available, value at screening otherwise.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in TJC Based on 28-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Twenty-eight joints were assessed for tenderness. Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 28.
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 4
TJC Based on 28-Joint Count During the Open Treatment Period
Twenty-eight joints were assessed for tenderness and joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0), giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 28. Baseline = Last value available before Day 0 (selection or Day 0) for placebo and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for tocilizumab group.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
TJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Forty joints were assessed for tenderness (5 MCP \[left and right\] joints, 5 PIP \[left and right joints\], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP \[left and right\] joints). Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 40. Baseline = value at Day 0 if available, value at screening otherwise.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in TJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Forty joints were assessed for tenderness (5 MCP \[left and right\] joints, 5 PIP \[left and right joints\], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP \[left and right\] joints). Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 40.
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 4
TJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Open Treatment Period
Forty joints were assessed for tenderness (5 MCP \[left and right\] joints, 5 PIP \[left and right joints\], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP \[left and right\] joints). Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 40. Baseline = Last value available before Day 0 (selection or Day 0) for placebo and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for tocilizumab group.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 28-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Twenty-eight joints were assessed for swelling. Joints were classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 28. Baseline = value at Day 0 if available, value at screening otherwise.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in SJC Based on 28-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Twenty-eight joints were assessed for swelling. Joints were classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 28.
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 4
Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 28-Joint Count During the Open Treatment Period
Twenty-eight joints were assessed for swelling (5 MCP \[left and right\] joints, 5 PIP \[left and right joints\], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP \[left and right\] joints) . Joints were classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 28. Baseline = Last value available before Day 0 (selection or Day 0) for placebo and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for tocilizumab group.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
SJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Forty joints were assessed for swelling (5 MCP \[left and right\] joints, 5 PIP \[left and right joints\], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP \[left and right\] joints). Joints were classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 40. Baseline = value at Day 0 if available, value at screening otherwise.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4
Percent Change From Baseline in SJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Forty joints were assessed for swelling (5 MCP \[left and right\] joints, 5 PIP \[left and right joints\], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP \[left and right\] joints). Joints were classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 40.
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 4
SJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Open Treatment Period
Forty joints were assessed for swelling (5 MCP \[left and right\] joints, 5 PIP \[left and right joints\], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP \[left and right\] joints). Joints were classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) for a total possible score of 0 to 40. Baseline = Last value available before Day 0 (selection or Day 0) for placebo and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for tocilizumab group.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 less than or equal to (≤3.2) = low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (\>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4
DAS28 During the Open Treatment Period
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 less than or equal to (≤3.2) = low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (\>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
Disease Activity Score Based on 40-Joints Count (DAS40) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
DAS40 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 40-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4
DAS40 During the Open Treatment Period
DAS40 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 40-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS40 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.