Major depressive disorder is a complex disease and most currently available antidepressants aiming at monoamine neurotransmission exhibit limited efficacy and cognitive effects. N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), one subtype of glutamate receptors, plays an important role in learning and memory. N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) enhancing agents, such as sarcosine (N-methylglycine), have been used as adjunctive therapy of schizophrenia. Sarcosine improved not only psychotic but also depressive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. To confirm its antidepressant effect, the purpose of this study is to compare citalopram and sarcosine in efficacy for major depressive patients.
Major depressive disorder is a complex disease and most currently available antidepressants aiming at monoamine neurotransmission exhibit limited efficacy and cognitive effects. Novel therapies via manipulating other neurotransmission (e.g. glutamate receptor) are being developed. NMDA enhancing agents, such as sarcosine have been demonstrated to improve negative symptoms and depressive symptoms of schizophrenic patients. The purpose of this study is to compare citalopram and sarcosine in aspects of efficacy, safety in major depressive patients. In the study, 40 major depressive patients are recruited into the 6-week trial and randomly assigned into the two groups (20-60 mg/d citalopram, or 500 - 1500 mg/d sarcosine) with a double-blind manner. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(17-item), CGI(Clinical Global Impression), GAF(Global Assessment of Function)and side effects are evaluated every two weeks during the trial. The efficacies of two groups are compared.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
40
20-60 mg/day, oral, for 6 weeks
500-1500 mg/day, oral, for 6 weeks
Department of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital
Taichung, Taiwan
17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
score change
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6
Remission rate
Time frame: week 0, 2,4, 6
GAF(Global Assessment of Function)
score changes
Time frame: Week 0, 2, 4, 6
dropout rate
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6
CGI(clinical global impression)
score changes
Time frame: week 0, 2, 4,6
Response Rate
Time frame: Week 0, 2, 4, 6
Factors of 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time frame: Week 0, 2, 4, 6
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.