Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and long term disability, particularly in young adults. Studies from Australia have shown that approximately half of those with severe traumatic brain injury will be severely disabled or dead 6 months post injury. Given the young age of many patients with severe TBI and the long term prevalence of major disability, the economic and more importantly the social cost to the community is very high. Pre-hospital and hospital management of patients with severe brain injury focuses on prevention of additional injury due primarily to lack of oxygen and insufficient blood pressure. This includes optimising sedation and ventilation, maintaining the fluid balance and draining Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) and performing surgery where appropriate. In recent years there has been a research focus on specific pharmacologic interventions, however, to date, there has been no treatment that has been associated with improvement of neurological outcomes. One treatment that shows promise is the application of hypothermia (cooling). This treatment is commonly used in Australia to decrease brain injury in patients with brain injury following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Cooling is thought to protect the brain using a number of mechanisms. There have been a number of animal studies that have looked at how cooling is protective and also some clinical research that suggests some benefit. However at the current time there is insufficient evidence to provide enough proof that cooling should be used routinely for patients with brain injury and like all treatments there can be some risks and side effects. The POLAR trial has been developed to investigate whether early cooling of patients with severe traumatic brain injury is associated with better outcomes. It is a randomised controlled trial, which is a type of trial that provides the highest quality of evidence. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the proportion of favourable neurological outcomes six months after severe traumatic brain injury in patients treated with early and sustained hypothermia, compared to standard normothermic management.
Eligible patients will be randomised in the pre-hospital setting or on admission to the Emergency Department. POLAR study trained paramedics and physicians will screen patients in the pre-hospital setting. Eligible patients will be randomised if they fulfil the inclusion criteria with no pre-hospital exclusion criteria. Those randomised to the normothermia group will follow standard care. For those randomised to the "cooling arm", pre-hospital prophylactic hypothermia will be induced by exposure and by infusing up to 2 litres intravenous cold (4°C) 0.9% sodium chloride aiming for a core temperature of 35°C during transport. In the emergency department the "cooling arm" patients will be assessed to exclude significant bleeding and, once significant bleeding has been excluded, surface cooling vests/wraps will be applied to reach the target core temperature of 33°C. The patient will be then maintained at this temperature for a further 72 hours. Patients with significant bleeding will have cooling withheld until it is safe to decrease the temperature to the target core temperature of 33°C. Patients who have not been randomised pre-hospital will be re-screened in the ED. Eligible patients will be randomised if they fulfil the inclusion criteria with no ED exclusion criteria. Hypothermia will be induced by administration of up to 2L intravenous ice-cold (4°C) 0.9% sodium chloride followed by application of the surface cooling vests/wraps to achieve the target core temperature of 33°C. Patients allocated to standard 'normothermic' care will be maintained at a core temperature of 37°C ± 0.5°C.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
511
exposure: Early and sustained hypothermia. Hypothermia will initially be induced by infusion of up to 2L ice cold saline. Following a safety assessment the patient will be rapidly cooled to 33C using surface temperature control equipment. They will be maintained at 33C for 72 hours. Rewarming will occur at a rate of 1C/4hrs and will be titrated to intracranial pressure (ICP) control and BP.
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Gold Coast University Hospital
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Alfred Hospital
Prahran, Victoria, Australia
Royal Perth Hospital
Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Hôpital St Jacques + CHRU Besançon
Besançon, Franche Comte, France
Hôpital La Cavale Blanche + CHRU Brest
Brest, France
Hôpital Gabriel Montpied + CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Hôpital Carémeau + CHU de Nimes
Nîmes, France
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Hôpital de Hautepierre
Strasbourg, France
...and 5 more locations
The proportion of favourable neurological outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Score Extended: GOSE 5 to 8)
The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) is an ordinal rating scale. The 8 scores in the scale are: Dead (1), Vegetative State (2), Lower Severe Disability (3), Upper Severe Disability (4), Lower Moderate Disability (5), Upper Moderate Disability (6), Lower Good Recovery (7), and Upper Good Recovery (8).
Time frame: 6 months post injury
Probability of an equal or greater GOSE level at 6 months compared to the probability of a lesser GOSE level, using a proportional odds model or partial proportional odds model
The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) is an ordinal rating scale. The 8 scores in the scale are: Dead (1), Vegetative State (2), Lower Severe Disability (3), Upper Severe Disability (4), Lower Moderate Disability (5), Upper Moderate Disability (6), Lower Good Recovery (7), and Upper Good Recovery (8).
Time frame: 6 months post injury
Quality of life assessments (QOL) o EQ5D o SF12
Quality of life assessments using the EQ-5D-3L and SF12. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system that comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The SF-12® Health Survey (SF-12) is a 12-item questionnaire used to assess health outcomes from the patient's perspective.
Time frame: 6 months post injury
Average causal effect of hypothermia on GOSE at 6 months comparing hypothermia and control patients who would survive regardless of treatment assignment.
This complier average causal effect (CACE) analysis will be conducted to estimate the average effect of cooling treatment on the primary outcome for patients who would comply with whichever cooling group they were assigned to, considering both the binary and continuous definitions of compliance with cooling.
Time frame: 6 months post injury
Mortality
All Cause Mortality
Time frame: Hospital Discharge and 6 Months post injury
Incidence of adverse events, specifically: o Bleeding o Infection.
The incidence of adverse events will be measured up to day 10 in both groups. The principle adverse events of interest will be bleeding (intracranial or extracranial) and infection (by site).
Time frame: Up to study day 10
Health economic evaluation
Cost-effectiveness from the health-care payer perspective will be calculated as a cost per additional patient with a favourable neurological outcome at 6 months following randomisation (defined as GOSE 5-8) and the cost per additional quality-adjusted life year, with quality-adjusted life years calculated using utility scores derived from the EQ-5D-3L conducted at 6 months post randomisation. Costs will be determined based on resource use during the intensive care, acute and post-acute periods up to six months post-randomisation. Where available, total costs of care provided by the state government through the relevant compensation scheme will be obtained for the subgroup of road trauma patients, and this data will be used to determine the cost per additional QALY and cost per additional favourable neurological outcome in this subgroup.
Time frame: 6 Months post injury
Pre-Specified sub group
The primary and secondary outcomes will be evaluated according to (i) the presence of surgically evacuated intracranial mass lesions (Marshall score V); and (ii) the presence of any intracranial mass lesion whether or not surgically evacuated (Marshall V or VI).
Time frame: 6 Months post injury
Dose effect / Intensity of cooling
Intensity of cooling in intervention arm patients will be categorised according to the time after randomization to first reach one of two core temperature thresholds, being 35°C and also 34°C. Cooling intensity categories are defined as never achieving hypothermia and tertiles of time in those reaching hypothermia. Primary and secondary outcomes of patients in these intensity categories will be compared across categories and to standard care patients.
Time frame: 6 months post injury
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.