The purpose of this study is to elucidate whether SentoClone® gives improved treatment responses in patients with advanced malignant melanoma in comparison to established reference treatment(s).
Malignant melanoma is one of the most common cancer forms worldwide and WHO estimates 132,000 new cases each year. The incidence rate vary up to 150-fold between different regions and ethnicities, the highest rates are found in emigrated Caucasian populations (e.g. Australia and New Zealand). There are few therapy alternatives for advanced malignant melanomas. At present, dacarbazine (Dacarbazine Medac®) is the most commonly used therapy. Immunotherapy with IL-2 and IFN is an alternative, but it is associated with multiple side effects. Hence, there remains a considerable need for alternative treatments. By using SentoClone®, autologous tumour-reactive lymphocytes are expanded and infused to the patient, where they have the opportunity to seek out and attack the primary tumour and metastases. The first step is to identify the tumour draining lymph node(s), which is done in parallel to surgical resection of the primary tumour or metastasis. The sentinel and/or metinel node(s), the initial meeting place between tumour antigen and the immune system, are further dissected and collected during the surgery. In this study SentoClone® will be compared with Dacarbazine Medac® and Temodal® which are currently regarded as standard first-line therapies in advanced malignant melanoma.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
140
SentoClone® are autologous tumour-reactive lymphocytes which are expanded and infused to the patient, where they have the opportunity to seek out and attack the primary tumour and metastases. The first step is to identify the tumour draining lymph node(s), which is done in parallel to surgical resection of the primary tumour or metastasis. The sentinel and/or metinel node(s), the initial meeting place between tumour antigen and the immune system, are further dissected and collected during the surgery. The lymphocytes are extracted from the collected lymph nodes and expanded in vitro, the lymphocytes are thereafter stimulated with tumour extract and returned to the patient intravenously as an autologous cell transfusion. The administered volume will be 100 ml for cell densities less than 3x106 cells/ml and 200 ml for cell densities of 3x106 cells/ml or more.
Dacarbazine (5-\[3,3-Dimethyl-1-triazenyl\]imidazole-4-carboxamide) is a widely used systemic treatment against advanced malignant melanoma. Dacarbazine is a cytostatic agent, which inhibits tumour growth by interfering with DNA-synthesises. The DNA-synthesis is inhibited by alkylation of the DNA molecule; however, it is unclear whether dacarbazine has other cytostatic impacts on cell mechanisms. Dacarbazine is inactive until liver passage, the liver converts dacarbazine to its reactive metabolites MTIC and HMMTIC, which alkylate DNA. Dacarbazine is light sensitive and needs to be administered intravenously. A newer analogue to dacarbazine, temozolomide (Temodal®), has been developed for oral administration. Temodal® is administered in capsules and is rapidly absorbed reaching peak concentrations after 20 minutes. Temodal® is converted to MTIC at physiological pH, the same reactive molecule as dacarbazine is metabolized to in the liver.
Lunds Universitetssjukhus
Lund, Skåne County, Sweden
RECRUITINGSödersjukhuset
Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden
RECRUITINGKarolinska Sjukhuset
Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden
Tumour response rate, defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (i.e. at least partial response) measured using the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours) criteria.
Time frame: At baseline and 18, 26 and 34 weeks after treatment
Progression-free survival
Time frame: From baseline to week 34 after initiated treatment
Overall survival
Time frame: From baseline to week 34 after initiated treatment
Time to tumour progression
Time frame: From baseline to week 34 after initiated treatment
Disease-free survival
Time frame: From baseline to week 34 after initiated treatment
Time to treatment failure
Time frame: From baseline to week 34 after initiated treatment
Duration of response
Time frame: From baseline to week 34 after initiated treatment
Correlation between tumour response and tumour marker S100
Time frame: From baseline to week 34 after initiated treatment
Proportion of patients showing toxic symptoms according to CTCAE criteria
Time frame: From baseline to week 34 after initiated treatment
Quality of life (EQ-5D and QLQ-C30)
Time frame: From baseline to week 34 after initiated treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Norrlands Universitetssjukhus
Umeå, Västerbotten County, Sweden
RECRUITINGSahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset
Gothenburg, Västra Götaland County, Sweden
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGAdverse Events (AEs) classified according to seriousness, causality, and intensity, clinically significant deviations in vital signs, clinical chemistry, and haematology
Time frame: From baseline to week 34 after initiated treatment