This study is looking at whether there is a difference in outcomes using two different types of breathing support in those patients who have chronic respiratory failure (patients who under-breathe). There is little data to demonstrate which mode of ventilation is better in terms of physiological outcomes and outcome data relating to patient symptoms. We hypothesize that one type of breathing support: pressure support ventilation would be more comfortable for patients as it more closely matches a patient's own respiratory pattern and and so leads to improved adherence and consequent improvement in quality of life. Patients with respiratory failure will be randomly assigned to receive either pressure support ventilation or pressure control ventilation for the first 6 weeks and then cross-over to receive the mode not previously used for a further 6 weeks. They will have baseline data recorded and then be followed up after each 6 week block.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
20
Pressure support ventilation
Pressure control ventilation
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
London, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGAdherence to ventilation
Time frame: 6 and 12 weeks
Arterial blood gases
Time frame: 6 and 12 weeks
Health related quality of life as measured by CRQ and SRI
Time frame: 6 and 12 weeks
Breathlessness (MRC dyspnoea score)
Time frame: 6 and 12 weeks
Assessment of daytime vigilance and fatigue by the Epworth sleepiness score,Oxford sleep resistance test and the fatigue severity score.
Time frame: 6 and 12 weeks
Sleep comfort as assessed by a visual analogue scale
Time frame: 6 and 12 weeks
Spirometry: forced expiratory volume in 1s and forced vital capacity
Time frame: 6 and 12 weeks
Respiratory muscle strength: maximum inspiratory pressure, maximum expiratory pressure and sniff nasal pressure
Time frame: 6 and 12 weeks
Sleep fragmentation as assessed by actigraphy
Time frame: 2 week perids from 4 and 10 weeks
Patient ventilator synchrony as measured by number of ineffective efforts
Time frame: 6 and 12 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.