This is a multicenter, placebo controlled, parallel group, double-blind, randomized comparison study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ropinirole IR tablets orally administered for 12 weeks in patients with symptomatic restless legs syndrome associated with Chronic kidney disease (CKD) managed with haemodialysis (including haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration) (hereinafter referred to as "uRLS"), to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term administration of ropinirole IR tablets, and assess the effect on the steady state pharmacokinetics in the long-term administration period of ropinirole IR tablets.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
34
Subjects completing the screening period will be randomized (1:1) to receive the IR or placebo for 12 weeks. The treatment will be started at the initial dose of 0.25 mg/day within 1 to 3 hours before bedtime. The maximum available dose is 3 mg/day. For all subjects completing short-term period and entering the long-term treatment period, the open-label treatment will be started from IR 0.25 mg/ day regardless of dose levels during short-term period. The dose will be upward titrated from 0.25 mg/day to 0.5 mg/day and after that in increments of 0.5 mg/day until sufficient efficacy is obtained (targeting "much improved" or "very much improved" in the CGI-I) without safety/tolerability problem.
Subjects completing the screening period will be randomized (1:1) to receive the IR or placebo for 12 weeks. The treatment will be started at the initial dose of 0.25 mg/day within 1 to 3 hours before bedtime.
GSK Investigational Site
Aichi, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Aichi, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Chiba, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Chiba, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Fukuoka, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Hiroshima, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Hokkaido, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Hyōgo, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Ibaraki, Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Ibaraki, Japan
...and 9 more locations
International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Rating Scale Total Score at Week 0 and Week 12
The IRLS rating scale is an investigator-rated scale consisting of 10 questions with a choice of 5 responses each. These responses are numerically scored from 0 (the least severe response) to 4 (the most severe response). The IRLS rating scale total score is calculated by summing the individual response scores. The highest possible score is 40, which represents the most severe RLS; the lowest possible score is 0, which represents an absence of RLS. A total of 17 participants were prematurely withdrawn from the study before Week 12.
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 12
IRLS Rating Scale Total Score for Participants Who Withdrew From the Double-Blind Treatment Period (DBT WD)
The IRLS rating scale is an investigator-rated scale consisting of 10 questions with a choice of 5 responses each. These responses are numerically scored from 0 (the least severe response) to 4 (the most severe response). The IRLS rating scale total score is calculated by summing the individual response scores. The highest possible score is 40, which represents the most severe RLS; the lowest possible score is 0, which represents an absence of RLS. A total of 17 participants were prematurely withdrawn from the study before Week 12, and 2 participants had missing DBT WD data.
Time frame: DBT WD (up to Week 12)
IRLS Rating Scale Total Score for Participants Who Withdrew in the Long-term Treatment Period (LONG WD)
The IRLS rating scale is an investigator-rated scale consisting of 10 questions with a choice of 5 responses each. These responses are numerically scored from 0 (the least severe response) to 4 (the most severe response). The IRLS rating scale total score is calculated by summing the individual response scores. The highest possible score is 40, which represents the most severe RLS; the lowest possible score is 0, which represents an absence of RLS.
Time frame: LONG WD (up to Week 64)
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scores at Week 12
The CGI-I assesses the participant's improvement or worsening of RLS from baseline with the following eight grades: 0 = Not Assessed, 1 = Very Much Improved, 2 = Much Improved, 3 = Minimally Improved, 4 = No Change, 5 = Minimally Worse, 6 = Much Worse, and 7 = Very Much Worse.
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Participants With the Indicated CGI-I Scores for Participants Who Withdrew From the Double-Blind Treatment Period (DBT WD)
The CGI-I assesses the participant's improvement or worsening of RLS from baseline with the following eight grades: 0 = Not Assessed, 1 = Very Much Improved, 2 = Much Improved, 3 = Minimally Improved, 4 = No Change, 5 = Minimally Worse, 6 = Much Worse, and 7 = Very Much Worse.
Time frame: DBT WD (up to Week 12)
Number of Participants With the Indicated CGI-I Scores for Participants Who Withdrew fn the Long-term Treatment Period (LONG WD)
The CGI-I assesses the participant's improvement or worsening of RLS from baseline with the following eight grades: 0 = Not Assessed, 1 = Very Much Improved, 2 = Much Improved, 3 = Minimally Improved, 4 = No Change, 5 = Minimally Worse, 6 = Much Worse, and 7 = Very Much Worse.
Time frame: LONG WD (up to Week 64)
Johns Hopkins Restless Legs Syndrome Quality of Life (RLSQOL) Questionnaire Overall Life Impact Score at Week 0 and Week 12
The RLSQOL questionnaire is a participant-rated questionnaire designed to assess the impact of RLS on the lives of participants. It consists of 18 items, 10 of which contribute to a single summary score (overall life impact). The response for each item is coded from 1 to 5, with 1 representing the best quality of life and 5 representing the worst quality of life. The lowest possible overall life impact score is 0, and the highest possible overall life impact score is 100. The score of 100 represents the best possible quality of life.
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 12
Johns Hopkins RLSQOL Questionnaire Overall Life Impact Score for Participants Who Withdrew From the Double-Blind Treatment Period (DBT WD)
The RLSQOL questionnaire is a participant-rated questionnaire designed to assess the impact of RLS on the lives of participants. It consists of 18 items, 10 of which contribute to a single summary score (overall life impact). The response for each item is coded from 1 to 5, with 1 representing the best quality of life and 5 representing the worst quality of life. The lowest possible overall life impact score is 0, and the highest possible overall life impact score is 100. The score of 100 represents the best possible quality of life.
Time frame: DBT WD (up to Week 12)
Johns Hopkins RLSQOL Questionnaire Overall Life Impact Score for Participants Who Withdrew in the Long-term Treatment Period (LONG WD)
The RLSQOL questionnaire is a participant-rated questionnaire designed to assess the impact of RLS on the lives of participants. It consists of 18 items, 10 of which contribute to a single summary score (overall life impact). The response for each item is coded from 1 to 5, with 1 representing the best quality of life and 5 representing the worst quality of life. The lowest possible overall life impact score is 0, and the highest possible overall life impact score is 100. The score of 100 represents the best possible quality of life.
Time frame: LONG WD (up to Week 64)
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score at Week 0 and Week 12
The PSQI consists of the following 7 domains: sleep quality, duration getting to sleep, sleep duration, sleep adequacy, sleep disturbance, use of sleeping pill, and somnolence. These domains are numerically scored from 0 to 3, with 0 representing the least severe response and 3 representing the most severe response. The PSQI total score is calculated by summing the individual domain scores. The highest possible score is 21, which represents the most disturbances in sleep quality; the lowest possible score is 0, which represents an absence of disturbances in sleep quality.
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 12
The PSQI Total Score for Participants Who Withdrew From the Double-Blind Treatment Period (DBT WD)
The PSQI consists of the following 7 domains: sleep quality, duration getting to sleep, sleep duration, sleep adequacy, sleep disturbance, use of sleeping pill, and somnolence. These domains are numerically scored from 0 to 3, with 0 representing the least severe response and 3 representing the most severe response. The PSQI total score is calculated by summing the individual domain scores. The highest possible score is 21, which represents the most disturbances in sleep quality; the lowest possible score is 0, which represents an absence of disturbances in sleep quality.
Time frame: DBT WD (up to Week 12)
The PSQI Total Score for Participants Who Withdrew fn the Long-term Treatment Period (LONG WD)
The PSQI consists of the following 7 domains: sleep quality, duration getting to sleep, sleep duration, sleep adequacy, sleep disturbance, use of sleeping pill, and somnolence. These domains are numerically scored from 0 to 3, with 0 representing the least severe response and 3 representing the most severe response. The PSQI total score is calculated by summing the individual domain scores. The highest possible score is 21, which represents the most disturbances in sleep quality; the lowest possible score is 0, which represents an absence of disturbances in sleep quality.
Time frame: LONG WD (up to Week 64)
Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Patient Satisfaction Question at Week 0 and Week 12
Participants responded to a question about their satisfaction with the IP on the following 1 to 7 scale: 1 = very much satisfied; 2 = satisfied; 3 = somewhat satisfied; 4 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 5 = somewhat dissatisfied; 6 = dissatisfied; and 7 = very dissatisfied. At Week 0, participants responded to a question about their satisfaction with their prior medications.
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 12
Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Patient Satisfaction Question for Participants Who Withdrew fn the Long-term Treatment Period (LONG WD)
Participants responded to a question about their satisfaction with the IP on the following 1 to 7 scale: 1 = very much satisfied; 2 = satisfied; 3 = somewhat satisfied; 4 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 5 = somewhat dissatisfied; 6 = dissatisfied; and 7 = very dissatisfied. At Week 0, participants responded to a question about their satisfaction with their prior medications.
Time frame: LONG WD (up to Week 64)
Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Patient Satisfaction Question for Participants Who Withdrew From the Double-Blind Treatment Period (DBT WD)
Participants responded to a question about their satisfaction with the IP on the following 1 to 7 scale: 1 = very much satisfied; 2 = satisfied; 3 = somewhat satisfied; 4 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 5 = somewhat dissatisfied; 6 = dissatisfied; and 7 = very dissatisfied. At Week 0, participants responded to a question about their satisfaction with their prior medications.
Time frame: DBT WD (up to Week 12)
Mean Daily Number of Hours of RLS Symptoms by Timeframe at Week 0 and Week 12
Participants recorded the onset time and total duration of RLS symptoms on their diary cards for 7 days from one week before each visit. Timeframes were defined as follows: daytime, 7:00AM to 4:59PM; evening, 5:00PM to 7:59PM; and nighttime, 8:00PM to 6:59AM.
Time frame: Week 0 and Week 12
Mean Daily Number of Hours of RLS Symptoms by Timeframe for Participants Who Withdrew From the Double-Blind Treatment Period (DBT WD)
Participants recorded the onset time and total duration of RLS symptoms on their diary cards for 7 days from one week before each visit. Timeframes were defined as follows: daytime, 7:00AM to 4:59PM; evening, 5:00PM to 7:59PM; and nighttime, 8:00PM to 6:59AM.
Time frame: DBT WD (up to Week 12)
Mean Daily Number of Hours of RLS Symptoms by Timeframe for Participants Who Withdrew fn the Long-term Treatment Period (LONG WD)
Participants recorded the onset time and total duration of RLS symptoms on their diary cards for 7 days from one week before each visit. Timeframes were defined as follows: daytime, 7:00AM to 4:59PM; evening, 5:00PM to 7:59PM; and nighttime, 8:00PM to 6:59AM.
Time frame: LONG WD (up to Week 64)
Drug Clearance Rate On-Dialysis and Off-Dialysis During the Maintenance Dose Treatment Phase (in the Long-term Treatment Period)
For on-dialysis analysis, measurements were to have been taken 1 hour before dialysis, in the artery/vein at the beginning, during, and end of dialysis, and 1 hour after dialysis. For off-dialysis analysis, measurements were to have been taken 1 hour before dialysis, at the beginning, during, and end of dialysis, and 1 hour after dialysis.
Time frame: Week 12 through Week 64
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.