A Study of Vemurafenib (RO5185426) in Comparison With Dacarbazine in Previously Untreated Patients With Metastatic Melanoma (BRIM 3)

Hoffmann-La Roche675 enrolled

Overview

This randomized, open-label study evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of vemurafenib (RO5185426) as compared to dacarbazine in previously untreated patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients were randomized to receive either vemurafenib 960 mg orally twice daily or dacarbazine 1000 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. Study treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The data and safety monitoring board recommended that patients in the dacarbazine group be allowed to cross over to receive vemurafenib, and the protocol was amended accordingly on January 14, 2011, as both overall survival and progression-free survival endpoints had met the prespecified criteria for statistical significance in favor of vemurafenib.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

675

Conditions

Malignant Melanoma

Interventions

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * adults, \>/=18 years of age * metastatic melanoma, stage IIIC or IV (AJCC) * treatment-naïve (no prior systemic anticancer therapy) * positive for BRAF V600E mutation * measurable disease by RECIST criteria * negative pregnancy test and, for fertile men and women, effective contraception during treatment and for 6 months after completion Exclusion Criteria: * active central nervous system metastases * history of carcinomatous meningitis * severe cardiovascular disease within 6 months prior to study drug administration * previous malignancy within 5 years prior to study, except for basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, melanoma in-situ, or carcinoma in-situ of the cervix

Locations (111)

Unnamed facility

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Unnamed facility

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Unnamed facility

Los Angeles, California, United States

Unnamed facility

San Francisco, California, United States

Unnamed facility

Santa Monica, California, United States

Unnamed facility

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Overall Survival

An Overall survival event was defined as death due to any cause. The number of participants with overall survival events is reported.

Time frame: From randomization (initiated January 2010) to December 30 2010. Median follow-up time in the vemurafenib group was 3.75 months (range 0.3 to 10.8) and in the dacarbazine group was 2.33 months (range <0.1 to 10.3).

Progression-free Survival

A progression-free survival (PFS) event was defined as disease progression or death due to any cause. Tumor response (progression) was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria using computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Time frame: From randomization (initiated January 2010) to December 30 2010.

Secondary Outcomes

Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response or Partial Response

BOR was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) confirmed per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Participants who never received study treatment and treated participants without any post-baseline tumor assessments were considered as non-responders. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, all non-target lesions and no new lesion. Any pathological lymph nodes must have had reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, no progression in non-target lesion and no new lesion.

Time frame: From randomization (initiated January 2010) until December 30, 2010

Duration of Response

Duration of response was defined as the time between the date of the earliest qualifying response and the date of disease progression or death due to any cause. Duration of response was calculated only for participants who had a best overall response of Complete Response or Partial Response and was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From randomization (initiated in January 2010) until December 30, 2010.

Time to Confirmed Response

Time to response was defined as the time from randomization to confirmed response (complete response or partial response).

Time frame: From randomization (initiated January 2010) until December 30, 2010.

Time to Treatment Failure

Treatment failure was defined as a secondary endpoint in the protocol, defined as death, disease progression or premature withdrawal of study treatment. This endpoint was not included in the Statistical analysis plan; therefore no analyses of time to treatment failure were performed.

Time frame: approximately 3 years

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

The intensity of AEs was graded according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0 (CTCAE) on a five-point scale (Grade 1 to 5: Mild, Moderate, Severe, Life-threatening and Death). A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution, for example is life-threatening, requires hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or requires intervention to prevent one or other of the outcomes listed above.

Time frame: From randomization (initiated January 2010) until December 30, 2010.

Pre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study Day

The pharmacokinetics of vemurafenib were assessed at the beginning of each 21-day cycle using pre-dose and 2-4 hours post-dose sampling.

Time frame: Plasma samples were collected before the morning dose (troughs) and 2-4 hours after the morning dose at the beginning of each cycle (Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 106, 148 and 190).