The purpose of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of Nadolol in hemangiomas of infancy. The secondary objective is to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial comparing nadolol with corticosteroids and propranolol.
Systemic corticosteroids are currently the most frequent used medication for treatment of problematic infantile hemangiomas (IH's). Since June 2008, systemic propranolol has been an important addition to the therapeutic options for problematic IH, allowing decreased dependence on the systemic corticosteroids. So far, we have found excellent response with propranolol with minimal short-term side effects. Studies, which compared nadolol and propranolol in children with other conditions, suggest that nadolol is safer and more efficacious than propranolol. In addition, it has better dosing schedules and less central nervous system (CNS) penetration, making it suitable even for patients with suspected or proven PHACES syndrome.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
Nadolol will be administered orally at home starting at 0.5 mg/kg/day divided into 2 doses. Weekly, if BP and heart rate are acceptable, the dose will be increased by 0.5 mg/kg/day up to 2 mg/kg/day.
The Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Proportion of subjects with at least 75% improvement in the extent of the hemangioma
Time frame: Baseline, 6months
The proportion of subjects with at least 50% improvement in the extent of the hemangiomas
The proportion of subjects with at least 50% improvement in the extent of the hemangiomas
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
The percentage of patients with >75% improvement in the Nadolol group compared to a historical cohort of patients receiving propranolol.
The percentage of patients with \>75% improvement in the Nadolol group compared to a historical cohort of patients receiving propranolol.
Time frame: 6 months
The correlation between the changes in the levels of angiogenesis markers and clinical response to treatment.
The correlation between the changes in the levels of angiogenesis markers and clinical response to treatment.
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.