The aim of the study is to value, in patients with chronic kidney disease and hypertension, whether medical therapy plus interventional renal artery revascularization is superior to medical therapy alone for the treatment of hemodynamically significant (\>70%) atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, diagnosed by duplex doppler ultrasonography and confirmed by magnetic resonance angiography, in terms of avoidance of the progression of renal damage, control of hypertension and in reducing the cerebro and cardiovascular complications.
Atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD), due to renal hypoperfusion caused by mono or bilateral renal artery stenosis (RAS), is a increasing cause of chronic kidney disease and many elderly patients start dialysis due to ARDVD. Moreover ARVD is frequently progressive and reduces life-expectancy more than other causes of end stage renal disease, with a mortality rate higher than in patients with stable angina, similar to that of patients operated for colon cancer. Unfortunately, there is not a definite therapy to cure this disease, despite important advancements in both medical therapy and in interventional radiology. Aim of the study is to see whether percutaneous transluminal interventional radiology plus stenting (PTRS) of the renal artery offers more, in terms of both preventing the progression of renal failure and controlling the hypertension, compared with the medical therapy addressed to control hypertension, improve the dyslipidemic profile and optimise the platelet anti-aggregant therapy, following the most recent guidelines. The eligible patients will be centrally randomized to: 1. medical treatment with hypotensive drugs (all class of hypotensive agents will be used according to single-center experience including drugs agent on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system, when permitted), lipid lowering therapy (namely all class of statins-or hydroxymethylglutaryl-coA reductase inhibitors)and anti-platelet (acetylsalicylate and/or ticlopidine or clopidrogel according to single-center experience) or to 2. the same medical therapy, as previously described in group a, associated with PTRS, according to a standardized protocol, with a follow up at 2 years extended to other 2 years
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
80
hypotensive drugs, statins and anti-platelets
Percutaneous transluminal renal artery stenting. The same medical therapy, as in group A, plus PTRS
Non-drug intervention, percutaneous transluminal renal artery stent angioplasty
Adding the renal artery stenting (in group B) to the optimal medical therapy (as in group A) that includes hypotensive drugs, statins and antiplatelet therapy
Divisione di Nefrologia e Dialisi, "Guglielmo da Saliceto" Hospital, Azienda USL Piacenza
Piacenza, Piacenza, Italy
Death, Initiation of dialysis therapy or either serum creatinine increase more than 20% or reduction by > 20% in estimated clearance of creatinine (with MDRD formula)
Time frame: 0.5, 1 and 2 years follow up plus extended 4 yrs
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure values at 0.5, 1 and 2 yrs follow up, with an extended follow up after 2 yrs
Time frame: 0.5, 1 and 2 years follow up plus extended 4 yrs
Number of hypotensive drugs
Time frame: 0.5, 1 and 2 years follow up plus extended 4 yrs
Results of renal scintigraphy
Time frame: 0.5, 1 and 2 years follow up plus extended 4 yrs
Incidence of complications due to interventional manoeuvres
Time frame: 0.5, 1 and 2 years follow up plus extended 4 yrs
Changes in the incidence of vascular complications in extra-renal districts
Time frame: 0.5, 1 and 2 years follow up plus extended 4 yrs
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.