Comparison of Outcomes in Mobile and Fixed-bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Seoul National University Hospital80 enrolled

Overview

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of mobile-bearing with that of fixed-bearing in total knee arthroplasty.

Double blind, randomized prospective study Mobile or fixed bearing of the same company * Mobile bearing group : group M * Fixed bearing group : group F Inclusion criteria * patients expected primary total knee arthroplasty without severe deformity Clinical outcomes * Range of motion * Complication * Scorings * KSS, KSFS, HSS score, WOMAC score, Oxford score, SF-36 Radiological outcomes * Alignment angles in knee * Positions of femoral and tibial components * Position of patella * Radiolucency

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

QUADRUPLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Osteoarthritis of Knee

Interventions

Mobile bearingDEVICE

Mobile bearing in total knee arthroplasty

Fixed bearingDEVICE

Fixed bearing in total knee arthroplasty

Eligibility

Sex: ALL

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * primary total knee arthroplasty Exclusion Criteria: * infection * severe deformity in knee * revision

Locations (1)

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, Seoul, South Korea

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Rotational Angle Between Femur and Tibia

Time frame: 2 weeks

Secondary Outcomes

Knee Society Score

Time frame: 6 months

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.