To determine if ultrasound-guided knee steroid injections are more effective than sham ultrasound knee steroid injections for the treatment of osteoarthritis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
33
Ultrasound will be used to image knee joint and guide needle for intra-articular corticosteroid injection.
Knee CS injection will be performed in the same method as the US-guided injection except that the US machine will be turned off. Study patient will be unaware of whether US machine is on or off.
West Haven Veteran's Administration Medical Center
West Haven, Connecticut, United States
Compare the effectiveness of US-guided vs. sham US CS intra-articular knee injections as measured by a 10-point between groups difference in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (KOOS).
Time frame: 4 weeks
Compare the effectiveness of US-guided vs. sham US CS knee injections in reducing pain as measured by KOOS.
Time frame: 2, 6, and 8 weeks
Compare the effectiveness of US-guided vs. sham US CS knee injections in improving self-reported lower extremity function.
Time frame: 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks
Compare the effectiveness of US-guided vs. sham US CS knee injections in reducing the proportion of patients experiencing knee pain.
Time frame: 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks
Compare the effectiveness of US-guided vs. sham US knee injections in reducing the use of co-therapies (acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and narcotics)
Time frame: 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks
Examine whether body mass index, presence or absence of chronic widespread pain, radiographic severity, patient expectations, patient satisfaction, and dispositional optimism predict response to CS injections.
Time frame: 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.